Wellcraft V20 Community

Go Back   Wellcraft V20 Community > Wellcraft V-20 Forums > Political Forum
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #51  
Unread 05-07-2022, 04:22 AM
bgreene bgreene is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Cherry Hill, NJ
Posts: 6,461
Default

This threads about the FACT that Trumps held in contempt of court and his attempt at avoidance denied .
Reply With Quote
  #52  
Unread 05-07-2022, 11:48 AM
Destroyer's Avatar
Destroyer Destroyer is offline
God
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Montville, NJ
Posts: 8,236
Cool

Quote:
Originally Posted by bgreene View Post
This threads about the FACT that Trumps held in contempt of court and his attempt at avoidance denied .
And once again, when a comment hit's home, the topic magically changes back to the original topic. In other words, once again an avoidance of the previous comment.

.
__________________
1987 V20 w/1987 150HP Yamaha on a Shoreland'r Trailer
1978 16.5 Airslot w/1996 120HP Force on a Four Winns trailer
1996 V21 w/1993 200HP Mercury on a Shoreline Trailer
All towed by a 5.7L Hemi Durango.


If God didn't have a purpose for us we wouldn't be here, so
Live simply, Love generously, Care deeply, Speak kindly.
(Leave the rest to God)

Silence, in the face of evil, is itself evil. Not to speak is to speak, not to act is to act. God will not hold us guiltless.
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Unread 05-07-2022, 01:12 PM
bgreene bgreene is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Cherry Hill, NJ
Posts: 6,461
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Destroyer View Post
And once again, when a comment hit's home, the topic magically changes back to the original topic. In other words, once again an avoidance of the previous comment.

.
Contempt of court - this IS the thread
Reply With Quote
  #54  
Unread 05-07-2022, 06:39 PM
scook's Avatar
scook scook is offline
God
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 1,432
Default

If it is about Trump being held in contempt, a part of normal legal process, then is is also about normal and customary legal process, where a ruling can be appealed.

Your confirmation bias doesn't allow you to withhold your opinion until the situation is adjudicated. You WANT to believe anything negative about Trump, so you can't control your gleeful reporting of the "fact" that he's guilty of all manner of things and is therefor "avoiding" his punishment.
__________________
Scott, Portland, OR '85 V-20 I/O, Merc 170
Reply With Quote
  #55  
Unread 05-07-2022, 08:03 PM
bgreene bgreene is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Cherry Hill, NJ
Posts: 6,461
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by scook View Post
If it is about Trump being held in contempt, a part of normal legal process, then is is also about normal and customary legal process, where a ruling can be appealed.

Your confirmation bias doesn't allow you to withhold your opinion until the situation is adjudicated. You WANT to believe anything negative about Trump, so you can't control your gleeful reporting of the "fact" that he's guilty of all manner of things and is therefor "avoiding" his punishment.
Wrong - just the facts scookie , just the facts
Reply With Quote
  #56  
Unread 05-07-2022, 11:55 PM
scook's Avatar
scook scook is offline
God
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 1,432
Default

The facts are as I stated them. If your understanding of the legal system is as limited as you demonstrate, you shouldn’t be starting a thread like this.
__________________
Scott, Portland, OR '85 V-20 I/O, Merc 170
Reply With Quote
  #57  
Unread 05-08-2022, 05:31 AM
bgreene bgreene is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Cherry Hill, NJ
Posts: 6,461
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by scook View Post
The facts are as I stated them. If your understanding of the legal system is as limited as you demonstrate, you shouldn’t be starting a thread like this.
Judge rejected trumps appeal - FACT
Reply With Quote
  #58  
Unread 05-08-2022, 07:01 AM
scook's Avatar
scook scook is offline
God
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 1,432
Default

If you had any experience observing court proceedings, or any honest knowledge of the process, you would know that courts often get it wrong. Yes, it may be a fact that the judge ruled one way or another, but that certainly doesn’t make the ruling factually correct.

I’ve witnessed a clever (of course, dishonest) lawyer perpetuate a lie on a court that resulted in a completely unjust ruling that cost the defendant a huge amount of money, and another similar result, solely due to prejudice on the part of the judge.

Resisting document production and appealing rulings in a politically motivated witch hunt is pretty rational behavior. One can only imagine the support you would be throwing behind one of your lying democrats in a parallel situation.
__________________
Scott, Portland, OR '85 V-20 I/O, Merc 170
Reply With Quote
  #59  
Unread 05-08-2022, 10:44 AM
bgreene bgreene is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Cherry Hill, NJ
Posts: 6,461
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by scook View Post
If you had any experience observing court proceedings, or any honest knowledge of the process, you would know that courts often get it wrong. Yes, it may be a fact that the judge ruled one way or another, but that certainly doesn’t make the ruling factually correct.

I’ve witnessed a clever (of course, dishonest) lawyer perpetuate a lie on a court that resulted in a completely unjust ruling that cost the defendant a huge amount of money, and another similar result, solely due to prejudice on the part of the judge.

Resisting document production and appealing rulings in a politically motivated witch hunt is pretty rational behavior. One can only imagine the support you would be throwing behind one of your lying democrats in a parallel situation.
The proven and obviously guilty are guilty scook - Democrat or Republican .
Reply With Quote
  #60  
Unread 05-08-2022, 12:46 PM
scook's Avatar
scook scook is offline
God
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 1,432
Default

Well, since it’s not proven until a court rules and then is subject to error on the part of the court, you are allowing your EXTREME confirmation bias the convict in your mind - only. Once again, completely unconcerned about the obviously guilty democrats - obvious through observation of their public behavior.
__________________
Scott, Portland, OR '85 V-20 I/O, Merc 170
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:45 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.