Trump lies about Ketanji Brown Jackson

[scook]

Definitely the wrong target after Saddam, without provocation, attacked our Navy ship, killing American sailors, held Americans hostage, invaded a neighboring country, etc.

[bgreene]

Originally Posted by scook

Definitely the wrong target after Saddam, without provocation, attacked our Navy ship, killing American sailors, held Americans hostage, invaded a neighboring country, etc.

It was Osama bin Laden who actually plotted the 911 attack - not Sadam.
And it was President Obama who ordered the attack that killed bin Laden.

[Destroyer]

Originally Posted by bgreene

It was Osama bin Laden who actually plotted the 911 attack - not Sadam.
And it was President Obama who ordered the attack that killed bin Laden.

But it was President Bush that provided the almost 4 years of intel that finally found Bin Laden and allowed Obama to order the attack.

.

[scook]

I seem to recall that it was credible intel, along with Sadam’s persistent threats that he had and would use weapons of mass destruction that started the Iraq situation and that it was pursued by Bush, the younger, for a number of reasons.

I agree with Destroyer that Obama gets credit for no more than allowing the mission that took out bin Laden. An interesting fact reported by, I think a Navy Seal is that the intel team that located bin Laden was made up of entirely women - women who actually earned their positions by superior work, not selected for their jobs “because they weren’t men”.

Biden is vigorously weakening our military and intel services with he’s far left, extreme gender and color driven promotion schemes. You don’t have to do that to get diversity - just don’t discriminate based on those factors.

[bgreene]

Originally Posted by scook

I seem to recall that it was credible intel, along with Sadam’s persistent threats that he had and would use weapons of mass destruction that started the Iraq situation and that it was pursued by Bush, the younger, for a number of reasons.

I agree with Destroyer that Obama gets credit for no more than allowing the mission that took out bin Laden. An interesting fact reported by, I think a Navy Seal is that the intel team that located bin Laden was made up of entirely women - women who actually earned their positions by superior work, not selected for their jobs “because they weren’t men”.

Biden is vigorously weakening our military and intel services with he’s far left, extreme gender and color driven promotion schemes. You don’t have to do that to get diversity - just don’t discriminate based on those factors.

Sadam was found NOT to have weapons of mass destruction .
You agree with destroyer - the only poster of vulgar cursing rants while you pretend to have issue with the slightest return of insult . Hypocrite .

[scook]

Your ignorance of decision making is astounding. An executive has to act on the best information he or she has. All credible intel as the time was that he had weapons of mass destruction and was intending to use them. What he was “found” to have later only means that the intel wasn’t correct, not that a bad decision was made.

There you go again with your all or nothing thinking. It’s not OK to agree with someone who’s correct, because you take exception with how they described you? Destroyer used different words than I have, but accurately described your asinine behavior. Your incessant, boring, droning repeating of your opinion on the subject as a self righteous tool to deflect and avoid actual, honest discussion is the height of hypocrisy - you are the hypocrite. You are the only poster using dishonest, non responsive foolishness.

[bgreene]

Originally Posted by scook

Your ignorance of decision making is astounding. An executive has to act on the best information he or she has. All credible intel as the time was that he had weapons of mass destruction and was intending to use them. What he was “found” to have later only means that the intel wasn’t correct, not that a bad decision was made.

There you go again with your all or nothing thinking. It’s not OK to agree with someone who’s correct, because you take exception with how they described you? Destroyer used different words than I have, but accurately described your asinine behavior. Your incessant, boring, droning repeating of your opinion on the subject as a self righteous tool to deflect and avoid actual, honest discussion is the height of hypocrisy - you are the hypocrite. You are the only poster using dishonest, non responsive foolishness.

FACTS indicate otherwise scook. FACTS are what I post and some of my own opinions too.

FACTS such as and including :
1. Trump LOST the election by large margin - but LIES that he won.
2. Trump could have but didn’t speak up much sooner against the attack on our Capitol .
3. Bin Laden was behind the 911 attack NOT Sadam - and Dick Chaney lied about Sadam having nucs.
4. You repeatedly posted that you are “ done arguing” but you continue . Hahaha funny.

I’m honest, steady , and fact check rather than believe all the lying cheating dictator loving traitor Trump says . Putin is a murderous tyranny dictator guilty of war crimes and trump loves him and takes his word over our our American intell people.
Disgusting .

[scook]

No, facts don’t indicate otherwise. If you disagree with my first paragraph, you are simply ignorant of decision making practice, well accepted by competent executives and highly respected executive education programs.

Your “fact checking” relies on biased, agended liberal “fact checkers” who are not reliable purveyors of the whole truth. Your incessant blathering about the election is irrelevant to this conversation (which you avoid engaging in), Dick Cheney did not lie about nukes, he relied on intel.

Putin is in fact a murderous tyrant dictator, who Trump understands, probably is impressed with his ability to hold control in a murderous environment, but most certainly doesn’t love and whose BS, he doesn’t tolerate. You notice that Putin’s invasions of Ukraine happened during weak, foolish, incompetent democrat administrations, not while Trump was president.

As for my posting after finding you to be a waste of time - your blather gets so egregious that some correction of the record becomes worthwhile - occasionally I try to appeal to what might be a tiny bit of sense in your very off track mind - that’s probably a waste of time, but hope springs eternal.

[bgreene]

Originally Posted by scook

No, facts don’t indicate otherwise. If you disagree with my first paragraph, you are simply ignorant of decision making practice, well accepted by competent executives and highly respected executive education programs.

Your “fact checking” relies on biased, agended liberal “fact checkers” who are not reliable purveyors of the whole truth. Your incessant blathering about the election is irrelevant to this conversation (which you avoid engaging in), Dick Cheney did not lie about nukes, he relied on intel.

Putin is in fact a murderous tyrant dictator, who Trump understands, probably is impressed with his ability to hold control in a murderous environment, but most certainly doesn’t love and whose BS, he doesn’t tolerate. You notice that Putin’s invasions of Ukraine happened during weak, foolish, incompetent democrat administrations, not while Trump was president.

As for my posting after finding you to be a waste of time - your blather gets so egregious that some correction of the record becomes worthwhile - occasionally I try to appeal to what might be a tiny bit of sense in your very off track mind - that’s probably a waste of time, but hope springs eternal.

Always the insults from the hypocrite who cries about insults .
So now your excuse for returning after posting at least twice that you were done is “ you feel obligated “. Hahaha whatever excuses work for you .
Me …..I don’t make excuses because I don’t have any need to back pedal .
But you go on

[scook]

You just can’t help yourself. If it weren’t so pathetic, it would be laughable.