Wellcraft V20 Community

Go Back   Wellcraft V20 Community > Wellcraft V-20 Forums > Modifications
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Unread 11-19-2009, 07:15 PM
joe7670 joe7670 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Miami
Posts: 422
Default

Mako know more than me about this, but I see enough room on my transom to mount the bracket higher.

Now on my bracket/platform there is a little bit of positive flotation that the bottom of it provides which I would guess you may loose as it goes higher.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Unread 11-20-2009, 11:51 AM
macojoe's Avatar
macojoe macojoe is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Carver, Ma.
Posts: 15,859
Send a message via AIM to macojoe Send a message via Yahoo to macojoe
Default

You will have to measure? But well craft has that horse shoe looking set in on the rear, you might be it to it and have to build out for a flush mount.

You can always mount a bracket at 25" and add a jack plate, but be sure to go with a shorter bracket set back as the jack plate will set you back about 6"

All food for thought, and I no longer have a V so I can't go out and measure. Before you get in to it take all measurements and figure all out.
__________________
1986 V20

Old Fishermen never die, we just SMELL that way!!
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Unread 11-20-2009, 12:08 PM
joe7670 joe7670 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Miami
Posts: 422
Default

You know what, i think Maco is right on the surface issue. From the looks on mine you only have about 2-3 inches before you start with the uneven surface of the half moon.

Maybe you would have to level that out as part of the transom conversion from i/o?
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Unread 11-23-2009, 07:44 AM
sunny717's Avatar
sunny717 sunny717 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: NJ, Exit 74
Posts: 19
Default Bracket

Quote:
Originally Posted by joe7670 View Post
Mako know more than me about this, but I see enough room on my transom to mount the bracket higher.

Now on my bracket/platform there is a little bit of positive flotation that the bottom of it provides which I would guess you may loose as it goes higher.
I keep seeing the smaller brackets with no platform, they look like they may fit inside the horseshoe.
As for positive flotation/buoyancy from a bracket, you gotta show me.
If you seal the chamber of the bracket and throw it in water by it self, I would bet it doesn't float.
Joe
__________________
Sunny
If con is the opposite of pro, is congress the opposite of progress?
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Unread 11-23-2009, 10:22 AM
RidgeRunner's Avatar
RidgeRunner RidgeRunner is offline
God
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Lakeland, Fl
Posts: 2,526
Default

When sealed up properly brackets definitely float and add bouyancy. There is a formula for calculating the exact amount of bouyancy. I heard somewhere that a 30" bracket has 70# bouyancy. Problem is, bouyancy is not evident if the bracket is mounted high out of the water. It certainly does not float like a piece of cork. In the water sealed off all by itself it would float motor end down with only the top 10" or so above the water line.(best guess) On my 20 the bracket adds bouyancy in heavy seas or coming off plane when it really gets dunked. I believe mine is about neutral in weight with the 500 lb motor hung on the back, boat at mooring. The manufacturers of the brackets can custom make anything your heart desires. There is a lot of conjecture about the correct mounting height for the bracket. I have done the bracket retrofit now on two boats less than 22' long. Stainless Marine gives a neat template to put on the transom, I have found their recommendation right on the money, their bracket raises the mounting height in relation to the keel to account for the water rising back up some 36" behind the boat where the lower unit meets the water. As far as a 30" shaft length, I don't like the idea, the less weight the better on a bracket. I like the jack-plate idea just fine and would recommend a smaller setback as has already been mentioned. 18" setback plus 6" for the jack plate would work nicely. My .04, adjusted for inflation
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Unread 11-23-2009, 10:30 AM
macojoe's Avatar
macojoe macojoe is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Carver, Ma.
Posts: 15,859
Send a message via AIM to macojoe Send a message via Yahoo to macojoe
Default

I have a smaller bracket on my sea ox thats fine, as for mounting in the horse shoe, tats why i said you have to measure.
As far as the flotation, your right I bet it would sink, but you are looking at it wrong, if you have a open bracket it allows the water to flood the bracket and the back will go down.
with a closed bracket, when back goes down it can't flood the bracket and helps with keeping the motor out of the water.

i took a ten foot wave and filled the v20 with water!! and i still say till today that the bracket when pushed up by a smaller wave is what saved us.
the motor was just about under and we were going in the water, when the wave pushed the motor up and it was running, gave it all the throttle i had and we made it out, after bailing fast with bucket we were able to make in to the harbor.

A open bracket will have not allowed for that, this is why a flotation bracket is recommended
__________________
1986 V20

Old Fishermen never die, we just SMELL that way!!
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Unread 11-23-2009, 11:11 AM
sunny717's Avatar
sunny717 sunny717 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: NJ, Exit 74
Posts: 19
Default Bracket Size

Thanx for the input.
I agree on the weight issue on the braket.
My goal would be good gas milage at cruising speed (25-30mph) rather top speed. We used to have a 20' Mako w/115merc. On a norml choppy day in Barnegat Bay, anything over 25mph was not fun on a 20' boat.
150/115hp would suit me fine, since most of the time it will be my wife and I in the boat.
__________________
Sunny
If con is the opposite of pro, is congress the opposite of progress?
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Unread 11-25-2009, 11:53 AM
RidgeRunner's Avatar
RidgeRunner RidgeRunner is offline
God
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Lakeland, Fl
Posts: 2,526
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sunny717 View Post
I keep seeing the smaller brackets with no platform, they look like they may fit inside the horseshoe.
As for positive flotation/buoyancy from a bracket, you gotta show me.
If you seal the chamber of the bracket and throw it in water by it self, I would bet it doesn't float.
Joe
I took the liberty of emailing Stainless Marine. The 30" setback single motor bracket without the platform has 310# bouyancy when completely submerged. Good luck with your projects
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Unread 11-26-2009, 11:56 PM
sunny717's Avatar
sunny717 sunny717 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: NJ, Exit 74
Posts: 19
Default Bracket Bouyancy

Thanks for getting that info.
I'm really surprised that its 310#.
I keep looking at Willys' pix, and I like his set up with an Armstrong bracket.

How about it Willy, if you had to do it again would you go the same route with your bracket?
Joe
__________________
Sunny
If con is the opposite of pro, is congress the opposite of progress?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:42 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.