Republicans now favor violence

[bgreene]

Originally Posted by Destroyer

Here's a news flash for you Greene.. Telling the police what you think of them is NOT against the law. In fact, it's protected by our first amendment (something you seem all too willing to trample on)/ The ONLY thing that is not permitted is threats of violence. Not against the police, not against politicians, not against individual citizens.

I don't know why you think that calling the Capital thugs and telling them what you think of them is somehow going to get anyone into trouble. Probably because your addled brain can't reason that far.

.

Now destoyer refers to our Capitol Police as “ thugs “
You have no respect for the police , well I respect our police force .

While the lying cheating con traitor delayed and delayed speaking up against the insurrectionists, many of our police were nearly fighting for their lives .

[Destroyer]

Originally Posted by bgreene

Now destoyer refers to our Capitol Police as “ thugs “
You have no respect for the police , well I respect our police force .

While the lying cheating con traitor delayed and delayed speaking up against the insurrectionists, many of our police were nearly fighting for their lives .

Oh please.... get real will you for once in your life?

When someone murders an unarmed person that presents no real threat, and then the entire "police" force protects him by refusing to divulge his name or bring him to trial that makes them ALL thugs. Yes, that's only my opinion, but it's shared with millions of other people.

.

[scook]

bgreene - your reply is predictably, completely non-responsive. I'm beginning to wonder if you know how to read, or if you just don't do it, or more likely ignore parts that don't support your ridiculous narrative. I pointed out that YOUR own link made it clear that the RNC didn't include the violent people in their "legitimate political discourse" statement - PERIOD.

[bgreene]

Originally Posted by scook

bgreene - your reply is predictably, completely non-responsive. I'm beginning to wonder if you know how to read, or if you just don't do it, or more likely ignore parts that don't support your ridiculous narrative. I pointed out that YOUR own link made it clear that the RNC didn't include the violent people in their "legitimate political discourse" statement - PERIOD.

BS ….and Mitch McConnell knew it too - that’s why he spoke up to tell the truth !
You’re vulgar white trash destroyer

[scook]

Mitch McConnel has nothing to do with it - YOUR OWN LINK MAKES IT CLEAR THAT THE RNC SAYS THEY DIDN'T MEAN THEIR STATEMENT TO INCLUDE THE VOILENT PROTESTERS. Maybe you read better in all caps.

[Pipe_Dream]

Originally Posted by bgreene

BS
You’re vulgar white trash destroyer

I thought you said that personal attacks were verboten.

[Destroyer]

Originally Posted by Pipe_Dream

I thought you said that personal attacks were verboten.

I'm just wondering why he said Scook was "vulgar White Trash Destroyer". Is his brain so scrambled that he doesn't even know who he's replying to?

.

[scook]

I think Destroyer may have worked out what was going on there. Lots of confusion indeed.

It's often hard to imagine that someone would post the stuff that comes from bgreene. No concern for the real and present threats, no honest, direct, on point responses and lots of ATTEMPTS at personal attacks, which are so ludicrous as to be laughable.