Wellcraft V20 Community

Go Back   Wellcraft V20 Community > Wellcraft V-20 Forums > General

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Unread 03-27-2008, 06:26 PM
spareparts's Avatar
spareparts spareparts is offline
God
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 6,192
Default

the main reason the 7.3 is such a good motor is Ford had nothing to do with the engine, they bought it from International, Ford put more input into the 6.0 and it didn't turn out so well
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Unread 03-27-2008, 07:02 PM
Abe460 Abe460 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: SouthWest, Louisiana
Posts: 20
Send a message via ICQ to Abe460 Send a message via Yahoo to Abe460
Default

I was told by one of our local school board reps. (whom we deal with everyday) that the 6.0's head bolts stretch and cause damage around 75k miles.
Unfortunately I have acquired the single truck contributing to the national deficit in gas consumption. A 2001 2500HD 4x4 extended cab sporting the 8.1, 496. 9mpg while empty or pulling every broke down ford I pass. Thank God for company vehicles.
__________________
1979 v20 I/O cuddy
towed with whatever runs that day.

"A people that values its privileges above its principles soon loses both."

Dwight D. Eisenhower
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Unread 03-27-2008, 07:26 PM
chumbucket's Avatar
chumbucket chumbucket is offline
God
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 5,067
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by spareparts View Post
the main reason the 7.3 is such a good motor is Ford had nothing to do with the engine, they bought it from International, Ford put more input into the 6.0 and it didn't turn out so well
And the cylinders can be resleeved on the 7.3 motor. Long lifespan.
__________________
Heavily medicated for your protection.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Unread 03-27-2008, 07:42 PM
spareparts's Avatar
spareparts spareparts is offline
God
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 6,192
Default

i may be wrong, but last time I had one of those(7.3) down( long time ago) I believe they were dry sleeve engines. We used to use them in street sweepers, used to use the old Detroit 8.2 till they stoped making them, we used teh 5.9 Cummins till we upped the hydraulic demands, we couldn't get the Cummins to make the torque we needed at 1000 rpm(had to be emmsion legal), so we stepped up to the 7.3 high torque 195 hp, worked great in those sweepers, about the time I left, they had just started to use the 24 valve 5.9, they seemed to work pretty good. Funny thing, they bought a whole bunch of GM 6.5 NAs with no warranty from GM, we used them in the twin engine trucks(Had to use an aux engine to spin the hydraulics), they would drive them to Rocky Mount from Wake Forest, NC to break them in, half of the engines didn't make it there, they would blow the crank right out the bottom
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Unread 03-28-2008, 10:55 AM
randlemanboater randlemanboater is offline
God
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Central NC
Posts: 5,868
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by spareparts View Post
the main reason the 7.3 is such a good motor is Ford had nothing to do with the engine, they bought it from International, Ford put more input into the 6.0 and it didn't turn out so well


Amen Brotha!!!
__________________
***************************************

Stay Safe!




Sold - 1984 V-20 Cuddy with a 2003 Johnson 140 hp gas sippin 4-stroke.

1995 Ranger 250C with a 2015 Suzuki 300 hp 4-stroke.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Unread 03-28-2008, 01:12 PM
nothingbuttrouble nothingbuttrouble is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: JONES INLET NEW YORK
Posts: 28
Send a message via ICQ to nothingbuttrouble
Default 7.3 best motor ever made

7.3 motor is the best diesel made ever. PERIOD. Millions of them were produced, and millions of them still run today. I have driven many F350, and superduty trucks with over 300k miles on them and they still ran great, they just start smokin a little after the years. Cummins and the GM 6.5 make some good motors too, but they dont come anywhere close to the reliability, and the proven performance of the 7.3 Just think of all the trucks that have them in it that you dont notice, ALMOST EVERY INTERNATIONAL TRUCK. Stop hating on FORDS!!! I got blue blood running through my viens.

Also, I tow my V with a Bronco, with the 5.0 in it (probably the second best motor ever made, yes its better then the GM 350), and the bronco pulls it up the ramp and down the road just fine.

Besides an F-Superduty 5 speed dually with the 7.3, the worlds second best tow vehicle is actually the new GMC 3500HD with a duramax and the allison automatic. My buddy had a wrecker with that drivetrain, and we towed a car at over 95 MPH down I-90 in NY.
__________________
NOTHING BUT TROUBLE III-1976 V with 1996 SPL 88-Running Jones Inlet area
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Unread 03-29-2008, 09:07 AM
bcmarinamanager's Avatar
bcmarinamanager bcmarinamanager is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Wilmington, NC
Posts: 300
Send a message via ICQ to bcmarinamanager
Default

Cummins, Cummins, Cummins. We run a couple of pretty large forklifts here (74,000 lbs) and they run the same block in it that's in the Dodge, just tuned down in the forklift. I'll post a picture in my album. The engine has no problem running our high pressure hydraulic lines and we're picking up 18,000lbs boats and running around the marina with them. In three years since we got our last truck we've put over 2500 hours on it with NO problems and NO power issues. It is a teir two engine, so it meets the governments emissions regs for 2002. We're getting a new one next week with the teir three engine which will run cleaner than my '05 Dodge. Oh BTW My truck is getting about 15mpg in town, and if I'm driving at 55-60mph she'll get about 18-20mpg.
__________________
Captain Jon
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Unread 03-29-2008, 09:44 AM
cterrebonne cterrebonne is offline
God
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: thibodaux, la
Posts: 1,293
Smile

[QUOTE=nothingbuttrouble;116675]

with the 5.0 in it (probably the second best motor ever made, yes its better then the GM 350),
[QUOTE]

i thought you were credible untill i read that.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Unread 03-29-2008, 09:13 PM
bradford's Avatar
bradford bradford is offline
God
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Wilmington Island, Georgia
Posts: 4,879
Default

[quote=cterrebonne;116733][quote=nothingbuttrouble;116675]

with the 5.0 in it (probably the second best motor ever made, yes its better then the GM 350),
Quote:

i thought you were credible untill i read that.

DOH!!!!
__________________
1985 Wellcraft V-20, Evinrude ETEC 150: SOLD
1979 Marine Trader 44, twin Ford Lehman 120s
2006 Panga 14, Tohatsu 20
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Unread 03-31-2008, 09:21 AM
nothingbuttrouble nothingbuttrouble is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: JONES INLET NEW YORK
Posts: 28
Send a message via ICQ to nothingbuttrouble
Default Chevy vs. Ford

Well if we can't agree on the 5.0/5.7 issue can we at least agree that the Chrysler 2.7 was the worst motor ever made.
__________________
NOTHING BUT TROUBLE III-1976 V with 1996 SPL 88-Running Jones Inlet area
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.