Log in

View Full Version : First outing 2008


cfelton
05-15-2008, 02:04 AM
My wife and I took the V out Saturday. We rode about 40 miles altogether. My boat ran great, no problems at all! I was a little concerned with the fuel consumption though. It used about 12 gallons of liquid gold! After talking with my buddy with the 86 V with the same motor ,he said his was much better than that. Ive got another carburator that ive already rebuilt that Ill try. Maybe it will get a little better mileage. Overall we had a great day out though!!
:beer:

C YENSEN
05-15-2008, 06:59 AM
congrats on the shake down cruise:beer:

randlemanboater
05-15-2008, 08:06 AM
3.3 MPG aint too bad.

The 2 stroke outboard guys would kill for that.

Pipe_Dream
05-15-2008, 08:19 AM
3.3 MPG aint too bad.

The 2 stroke outboard guys would kill for that.
Not this one. I'm doing much better than that.

Airslot
05-15-2008, 08:29 AM
3.3 is what I've averaged over the last 4 years or so that I've kept track with my 150 2 smoke.

THEFERMANATOR
05-15-2008, 09:08 AM
Not this one. I'm doing much better than that.


3 letters for you, DFI. Them there direct injected motors can do pretty good now. I'd be happy to get 3.3 out of my flats boat, but that old 150 MERC likes to run.

Pipe_Dream
05-15-2008, 09:54 AM
3 letters for you, DFI. Them there direct injected motors can do pretty good now. I'd be happy to get 3.3 out of my flats boat, but that old 150 MERC likes to run.
Or in my case, HPDI. It's very efficient, and clean-running. Not as quiet as a 4-stroke, of course, but it's lighter than a 4, and if you're into the hole-shot it'll grab your attention.

randlemanboater
05-15-2008, 10:45 AM
3.3 MPG aint too bad.

The 2 stroke outboard guys would kill for that.


Let me rephrase that......3.3 mpg, that is terrible. You might as well be running a 2 stroke outboard, getting that mpg.

Pipe_Dream
05-15-2008, 10:55 AM
Let me rephrase that......3.3 mpg, that is terrible. You might as well be running a 2 stroke outboard, getting that mpg.
heh heh

macojoe
05-15-2008, 11:13 AM
3.3 is fine for a 2 stroke! I was running 86 Yamaha & 89 Evinrude both 175 hp average was the same for both 2.5

I will be happy to get the same with the Sea Ox??

csvencer
05-15-2008, 12:18 PM
I am only averaging about 2.25 out of my 2000 Johnson, but those loopers are known for drinking gas and oil so I can't really complain.

-Svence

randlemanboater
05-15-2008, 12:43 PM
I am only averaging about 2.25 out of my 2000 Johnson, but those loopers are known for drinking gas and oil so I can't really complain.

-Svence

Like I said......Those 2 stroke guys are enveous of 3.3 mpg. (Man, I feel like John Kerry)

bradford
05-15-2008, 11:37 PM
With a 225 looper I don't even want to know.:cry:

turbinedoctor
05-16-2008, 01:25 AM
Like I said......Those 2 stroke guys are enveous of 3.3 mpg. (Man, I feel like John Kerry)


I think John took lessons from you.

Hummmm which side do I want to go with this time???? :devil:

cfelton
05-16-2008, 02:10 AM
CY, what kinda milage are you getting? We got the same setup. My 170 I/O has been bored .040 oversized, and I can see it could take a little more fuel. Maybe Ill rejet the carb with a couple size smaller jets and give it a try.

spareparts
05-16-2008, 06:28 AM
check the power valve(brass thing in the bottom of the fuel bowl, they tend to get crap in them and stick open and will dribble gas into the engine, also check the plunger that pushes the power valve open, make sure its not sticking. Some of the rebuild kits come woth a new power valve, I ususally don't use them, they don't seem to be of the same quality as the ones that are in th carb from the begining. Do you have the Mercarb( one idle mixture screw) or Rochester(two idle mixture screws)? If you have the Mercarb, try and find a Rochester off of an 888 Mecruiser, they will adapt with a little work, and will run, idle, and perform much better than that Mercarb, at the very least, try to find a later model Mercarb that doesn't use the double lipped accelerator pump, the internal metering was redesigned to fix soem of the issues with earlier Mercarbs

cfelton
05-16-2008, 11:43 PM
Thanks Spare, I've got a Mercarb on it now. I rebuilt it before I put it on and it runs really good. The original carb is a rochester with the 2 jets at the bottom of the barrels. I put a kit in it but the jet screws were broken off flush with the carb base. It ran ok but leaked a little gas into the throat after I cut it off. I removed the retaining tab,spring and ckeck ball and cleaned it well. After replacing all the leak stopped, but with the jets broken off I couldnt make any adjustments on the high speed side. Ill try and get those broken jets out and replace them and maybe try it again. Thanks again!!

randlemanboater
05-17-2008, 09:01 AM
I think John took lessons from you.

Hummmm which side do I want to go with this time???? :devil:


I get 5 mpg........thats all I've got to say about that.

randlemanboater
05-17-2008, 09:03 AM
check the power valve(brass thing in the bottom of the fuel bowl, they tend to get crap in them and stick open and will dribble gas into the engine, also check the plunger that pushes the power valve open, make sure its not sticking. Some of the rebuild kits come woth a new power valve, I ususally don't use them, they don't seem to be of the same quality as the ones that are in th carb from the begining. Do you have the Mercarb( one idle mixture screw) or Rochester(two idle mixture screws)? If you have the Mercarb, try and find a Rochester off of an 888 Mecruiser, they will adapt with a little work, and will run, idle, and perform much better than that Mercarb, at the very least, try to find a later model Mercarb that doesn't use the double lipped accelerator pump, the internal metering was redesigned to fix soem of the issues with earlier Mercarbs


Thank goodness someone with something constructive to add came along.......thanks SP.


No wait, I don't agree.

Well, maybe I do.