Republican Kevin McCarthy caught lying

[bgreene]

Originally Posted by scook

You demonstrate your displeasure with being corrected very vigorously. I’m not raining down insults, I’m providing an honest evaluation of your avoidance and very unbalanced view of affairs. You are so extreme in your imbalance and so supportive of the unproductive division which is, in my opinion, very much driven by the left that I expressed my opinion that your BEHAVIOR is despicable.

I will correct my statement in this respect, Biden the Nazi, per se is an overstatement, but he is pursuing one policy that you attributed to Trump and claimed that it was part of his Nazification plan - the “truth commission”, and several others that were active in the Nazi program.

Scookie - you state your nasty opinion of me on nearly all of your posts.
Insults and denial ….your “ contribution “ .

Me…I’m sticking with posting FACTS and the TRUTH…….with occasional response to your nasty comments … Now go have a cookie….scookie.

[scook]

I don’t actually state any nasty opinions of you, I comment on you behavior. No one here, that I’m aware of, wants to have this kind of exchanges. You began the political friction with your, in most peoples’ opinion, strident and pretty obnoxious posts and then when challenged, maybe not so gently, ramped it up with more strident posts, progressing to gleefully posting ANYTHING negative you could dig up on Republicans or conservatives, much of which is highly suspect in the minds of most of the guys here.

It really appears that a major motivation of yours is simply to be antagonistic. It also appears that you don’t care much, if at all, about the very serious damage being done to our very great country by the highly polarizing behavior of the left. Some examples of that are: the thoroughly dishonest impeachment process, based on information fully known to be false and adding lies that there was hard evidence; officially attacking free speech with the “truth commission”; and the active support for the ongoing rioting, destruction of property and peoples’ livelihoods, defunding the police, resulting in a very significant increase in murders and injuries of police and very numerous murders of people of color.

You express legitimate concerns about Trump and the risks of an ego that large occupying the presidency. It’s the opinion of most of the others here that your concern is extreme, beyond anything that’s at all likely to occur under your narrative, and that the current administration is extremely bad for the country and world in its own, different way.

Does any of this make sense to you?

[bgreene]

Originally Posted by scook

I don’t actually state any nasty opinions of you, I comment on you behavior. No one here, that I’m aware of, wants to have this kind of exchanges. You began the political friction with your, in most peoples’ opinion, strident and pretty obnoxious posts and then when challenged, maybe not so gently, ramped it up with more strident posts, progressing to gleefully posting ANYTHING negative you could dig up on Republicans or conservatives, much of which is highly suspect in the minds of most of the guys here.

It really appears that a major motivation of yours is simply to be antagonistic. It also appears that you don’t care much, if at all, about the very serious damage being done to our very great country by the highly polarizing behavior of the left. Some examples of that are: the thoroughly dishonest impeachment process, based on information fully known to be false and adding lies that there was hard evidence; officially attacking free speech with the “truth commission”; and the active support for the ongoing rioting, destruction of property and peoples’ livelihoods, defunding the police, resulting in a very significant increase in murders and injuries of police and very numerous murders of people of color.

You express legitimate concerns about Trump and the risks of an ego that large occupying the presidency. It’s the opinion of most of the others here that your concern is extreme, beyond anything that’s at all likely to occur under your narrative, and that the current administration is extremely bad for the country and world in its own, different way.

Does any of this make sense to you?

FACTS and the TRUTH make sense to me scook - not your opinions about me or about my motivation.
Facts ….from who’s posted vulgar, cursing rants at me, to your near constant belittling most everything about me and what I post.
But that’s how you and other roll, not how I roll.
And as you should have noticed by now, does not affect my continued posting facts.

[scook]

Well, it doesn’t affect your continuous posting but you’re alone here thinking that you primarily post facts and consistent in not responding to the most thoughtful queries of you. Unfortunately, it is exactly how you roll.

[bgreene]

Originally Posted by scook

Well, it doesn’t affect your continuous posting but you’re alone here thinking that you primarily post facts and consistent in not responding to the most thoughtful queries of you. Unfortunately, it is exactly how you roll.

Scook:
I’m not interested in popularity on this site.
I do not seek the “ support” of others here .
This is the political forum and I post facts and the truth…..not conspiracy theories .

[scook]

The FACT is that many of your “facts” are suspect and some are just plain lies from your trusted by you, but proven lying sources, and you do post conspiracy theories, the chiefest of which is your Trump as Nazi scenario.

Your incessant repeating of your favorite lines doesn’t make them any truer than when they were false the first time you said them.

[bgreene]

Originally Posted by scook

The FACT is that many of your “facts” are suspect and some are just plain lies from your trusted by you, but proven lying sources, and you do post conspiracy theories, the chiefest of which is your Trump as Nazi scenario.

Your incessant repeating of your favorite lines doesn’t make them any truer than when they were false the first time you said them.

Well that’s your OPINION, and as for the parallel of APPROACH Trump uses …..mirroring Hilters initial approach, this is true also:
1. He identifies a so called enemy and continues a lie
2. He then attaches nationalistic pride to stir the people
3. He tries to insert loyalists to key positions until power gained to assert absolute power.
I did not refer to Trump as a Nazi so try being accurate .

Next ……just because you label information as “ fake news” does not make it so.
Trump started that claim of labeling anything unflattering as “ fake” which his followers embrace.

[scook]

1. Your #1 is a chapter from the democrat playbook - it’s pretty obvious that there were plenty of actual enemies, e.g. the FBI, lying congressional democrats pursuing every imaginable fraudulent “investigation”, Clinton’s stirring up their fake document, CNN, etc.

2. After Obama apologizing for America’s greatness all over the world, a little America first was appropriate. If you recall, when attacked by some dishonest partisan reporter on the subject, he said that of course he was “America first” and any country’s leader who didn’t put their country first shouldn’t have the job.

3. All competent leaders/executives place their people in positions where loyalty is important. Remember when he kept some Obama people in the WhiteHouse and they were actively undermining his policies, lying and leaking information? Gaining absolute power? There’s your #1 conspiracy theory again. It’s pretty appropriate for someone under the level of attack he constantly lived with to try to consolidate power, in an effort to get things done. Your left wing politicians certainly do that.

You did make clear that you viewed him as a Hitler-like actor - my shortening it to that phrase is not inaccurate or misleading.

My giving clear, undeniable proof that your news sources are lying DOES make “fake news” an honest label and he called the plethora of lies and misinformation the likes of CNN, NYT, etc. tried to trowel onto him “fake news” because that’s exactly what it was. You couldn’t have watched his news conferences and the wildly dishonest questions the far left reporters asked and not be aware of that.

Your entire post is just more of your extreme, biased narrative.

[bgreene]

Originally Posted by scook

1. Your #1 is a chapter from the democrat playbook - it’s pretty obvious that there were plenty of actual enemies, e.g. the FBI, lying congressional democrats pursuing every imaginable fraudulent “investigation”, Clinton’s stirring up their fake document, CNN, etc.

2. After Obama apologizing for America’s greatness all over the world, a little America first was appropriate. If you recall, when attacked by some dishonest partisan reporter on the subject, he said that of course he was “America first” and any country’s leader who didn’t put their country first shouldn’t have the job.

3. All competent leaders/executives place their people in positions where loyalty is important. Remember when he kept some Obama people in the WhiteHouse and they were actively undermining his policies, lying and leaking information? Gaining absolute power? There’s your #1 conspiracy theory again. It’s pretty appropriate for someone under the level of attack he constantly lived with to try to consolidate power, in an effort to get things done. Your left wing politicians certainly do that.

You did make clear that you viewed him as a Hitler-like actor - my shortening it to that phrase is not inaccurate or misleading.

My giving clear, undeniable proof that your news sources are lying DOES make “fake news” an honest label and he called the plethora of lies and misinformation the likes of CNN, NYT, etc. tried to trowel onto him “fake news” because that’s exactly what it was. You couldn’t have watched his news conferences and the wildly dishonest questions the far left reporters asked and not be aware of that.

Your entire post is just more of your extreme, biased narrative.

Masterpiece of nonsense.
You sure post a LOT for a guy who claims “ too busy doing real work”, bored with my posts , and done arguing.
All this youve posted - FACT.

[scook]

If it’s a masterpiece, it’s one that very accurately debunks your previous post in its entirety, just a factual analysis, without insults.

Off to do real work.