Name 1 thing crooked Stupid dealing Joe has done, just one thing

[bgreene]

Originally Posted by scook

And do you honestly believe that, even stretching the actual infrastructure contained in the bill to 24%, that makes it a good thing? Sold vigorously as an infrastructure bill, being only 75% a lie, makes it truth and fact?

No scook - that was all it took to prove destroyers comment wrong as usual.
Heres whats in the bill and its very good ok so maybe calm down with the tricky comments

Take your pick
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/11/15/u...ture-bill.html

https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-...tructure-deal/

https://apnews.com/article/joe-biden...e9fc91f5eb4c0d

[Destroyer]

Originally Posted by bgreene

No scook - that was all it took to prove destroyers comment wrong as usual.
Heres whats in the bill and its very good ok so maybe calm down with the tricky comments

Take your pick
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/11/15/u...ture-bill.html

https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-...tructure-deal/

https://apnews.com/article/joe-biden...e9fc91f5eb4c0d

Ok, so I looked at your links (the same ones you provided earlier) and it still doesn't add up to 1.75 Trillion dollars. So where is the rest of the money being spent? Stop dodging the question.

And exactly where did you prove my comment wrong? You mean where you cherrypicked one sentence from an entire paragraph without adding in the Fact that they are calling things that have never been called "infrastructure" before into the bill so it looks better? But even that still only accounts for only 24% of the money. I'll stand by my original comment that only about 7% of the bill is going to traditional infrastructure items.

.

[bgreene]

Originally Posted by Destroyer

Ok, so I looked at your links (the same ones you provided earlier) and it still doesn't add up to 1.75 Trillion dollars. So where is the rest of the money being spent? Stop dodging the question.

And exactly where did you prove my comment wrong? You mean where you cherrypicked one sentence from an entire paragraph without adding in the Fact that they are calling things that have never been called "infrastructure" before into the bill so it looks better? But even that still only accounts for only 24% of the money. I'll stand by my original comment that only about 7% of the bill is going to traditional infrastructure items.

.

The rest of the moneys being spent to automatically delete all your personal insults, cursing, and vulgarity from web sites across our nation. That alone will cost billions due to the volume of your nonsense .

[Destroyer]

Originally Posted by bgreene

The rest of the moneys being spent to automatically delete all your personal insults, cursing, and vulgarity from web sites across our nation. That alone will cost billions due to the volume of your nonsense .

WOW ... Talk about childish nonsense, that one takes the cake. You hurl personal insults at people in almost ever post you make and then you have the nerve, the audacity to accuse others. You're amazing.

Now, how about trying to act like an adult instead of a coward hiding behind personal insults and actually answer the question posed to you. Where is the rest of the money going? Or don't you know?

.

[bgreene]

Originally Posted by Destroyer

WOW ... Talk about childish nonsense, that one takes the cake. You hurl personal insults at people in almost ever post you make and then you have the nerve, the audacity to accuse others. You're amazing.

Now, how about trying to act like an adult instead of a coward hiding behind personal insults and actually answer the question posed to you. Where is the rest of the money going? Or don't you know?

.

This thread was a request to name “ ONE “ good thing Bidens done.
I named two, accurately . All good till destroyer got involved.

[Pipe_Dream]

If you can't take the heat

[bgreene]

Originally Posted by Pipe_Dream

If you can't take the heat

Hah - another excuse when you’ve got nothing

[bgreene]

[QUOTE=bgreene;245199]Hah - another excuse when youve got nothing, as usual .

[scook]

bgreene - your response to my post was snarky, disrespectful and condescending - there nothing in my post that’s the least bit tricky and I certainly don’t need you telling me to calm down. I calmly pointed out that when a bill is sold as infrastructure and 76% of it’s not infrastructure, it’s dishonest.

Whether or not everything in the bill is good, which I don’t agree with, that doesn’t mean we can afford to pay for it.

[bgreene]

Originally Posted by scook

bgreene - your response to my post was snarky, disrespectful and condescending - there nothing in my post that’s the least bit tricky and I certainly don’t need you telling me to calm down. I calmly pointed out that when a bill is sold as infrastructure and 76% of it’s not infrastructure, it’s dishonest.

Whether or not everything in the bill is good, which I don’t agree with, that doesn’t mean we can afford to pay for it.

Well I disagree with everything you wrote here including the percentage of the infrastructure bill. Even broadband extension for more complete coverage is infrastructure .


https://apnews.com/article/joe-biden...e9fc91f5eb4c0d