Wellcraft V20 Community

Go Back   Wellcraft V20 Community > Wellcraft V-20 Forums > Performance
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Unread 06-20-2009, 10:46 PM
Steplift 72' Steplift 72' is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Constance Beach, Louisiana.....100 feet from the Gulf of Mexico
Posts: 157
Default

There's such a range of equipment and load on boats..... A very lightly loaded V20 will run OK with a 115 2 stroke, but a 150 will push them light or heavy. The boats with 200 or more horsepower will fly, somewhat over 50 mph depending on load and prop. The old Alim's were designed as raceboats, but in those days a raceboat had a totally different meaning than today. My 72' model ran well with 135 hp, but I didn't even have a radio or bilge pump so you could say light load to the extreme with only the factory twin 20 gallon saddle tanks. There's no more efficient bilge pump than a scared man with a 5 gallon bucket, and it still works even if your battery fails.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Unread 06-21-2009, 05:14 PM
RABBITFISH's Avatar
RABBITFISH RABBITFISH is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: KENNER LOUISIANA
Posts: 282
Cool My2 cents

For what it's worth, I originally started with a 140 Suzuki, top end ran about 42, and that was with a light load. However crusing speeds were more in the 28 to 34 mph range. As the need for speed grew, I graduated to what I am using now, a 225 Yamaha 0x66 and wot runs in the low 50's which in my opinion is not very practical, nor do I ever run that fast. I generally run about 3800 to 4200 rpm and get my 38 to 42 mph out of that but there is a lot more throttle left.....When I run offshore in any kind of seas, I am only running what I need to stay on top and trimmed, usually about 2800 to 3200 rpm and 28 to 30 mph... I hardly ever use the rest of the motor's power. Also, looking back on early pictures of my boat I observed that it now rides a lot lower in the stern and with a couple guys in the back the scuppers are under.........Rethinking and looking back I would probably go down to a 150 or a 175 where I think the torque and hp would help to keep on plane and manage any loads, but still keep the overall weight in the rear a little more manageable. I am not sure of the weight difference betweena a 150 and a 225, but it seems like the weight on the back is critical.........

Tommy
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.