“2000 Mules “ movie of nonsense

[scook]

Of course you don’t - you’re all in with the practice of willful ignorance. You make bold pronouncements about things you know nothing about - what a brilliant way to have a discussion. Oh, wait, you don’t want discussion, you want suckers to swallow your biased nonsense whole, without chewing.

[bgreene]

Originally Posted by scook

Of course you don’t - you’re all in with the practice of willful ignorance. You make bold pronouncements about things you know nothing about - what a brilliant way to have a discussion. Oh, wait, you don’t want discussion, you want suckers to swallow your biased nonsense whole, without chewing.

You certainly are a tense bitter man.
You asked if I watched - no - but I read the entire briefing .
Try to calm down Mr Angry

[scook]

Nothing bitter, tense or angry, just amazed at how much foolishness you can shovel and have any notion that anyone else will swallow it.

[bgreene]

From Conservative


……..”2000 Mules doesn’t survive the most basic fact-checks to support its most important claims. See them here, here, here, and here. But, let’s stipulate that the film’s purpose isn’t really to present facts.

Because if it were true that D’Souza had rock-solid evidence of widespread voter fraud in his possession, would a true patriot like him be selling that evidence for $29.99 per download? Bwahahaha”

[scook]

Yeah, that really sounds like it’s from a conservative, and as Ben Shapiro said, while he didn’t consider it “rock solid evidence” it is very suspicious and demands law enforcement investigation.

[bgreene]

Originally Posted by scook

Yeah, that really sounds like it’s from a conservative, and as Ben Shapiro said, while he didn’t consider it “rock solid evidence” it is very suspicious and demands law enforcement investigation.

It’s National Inquirer junk for the conspiracy theorists to feast on.
Nothing more ….same as the “ pillow mans absolute proof” …..he had nothing and gave it up.
Our founding fathers would consider you and trump a traitor - which trump is.

[bgreene]

Originally Posted by scook

Yeah, that really sounds like it’s from a conservative, and as Ben Shapiro said, while he didn’t consider it “rock solid evidence” it is very suspicious and demands law enforcement investigation.

It’s National Inquirer junk for the conspiracy theorists to feast on.
Nothing more ….same as the “ pillow mans absolute proof” …..he had nothing and gave it up.
Our founding fathers would consider you and trump a traitor - which trump is.

[scook]

They would consider you a willfully ignorant fool and a liar for your baseless accusations.

If Ben says its suspicious, it's suspicious - I notice you didn't source the "conservative", since that's very likely false as well.

[Pipe_Dream]

Originally Posted by bgreene

It’s National Inquirer junk for the conspiracy theorists to feast on.
Nothing more ….same as the “ pillow mans absolute proof” …..he had nothing and gave it up.
Our founding fathers would consider you and trump a traitor - which trump is.

Interesting that you posted this exact same thing an hour later than you posted it the first time. That's what one would expect from a bot.