Roe-Wade Woman’s right of choice

[Pipe_Dream]

Originally Posted by bgreene

Life begins at conception ?

Yes. Follow the science.

https://acpeds.org/position-statemen...an-life-begins

[Pipe_Dream]

Originally Posted by bgreene

I’m PRO CHOICE .

You're pro-killing human fetuses in the womb. We get it.

[Pipe_Dream]

Originally Posted by bgreene

Also notice that you don’t come out AGAINST inclusion of rape and incest in abortion laws, you instead call it “ reasonable provisions “ ….

[bgreene]

Originally Posted by Pipe_Dream

WRONG …..pro choice is PRO CHOICE …
Nice spin as usual

[Pipe_Dream]

Originally Posted by bgreene

Life begins at conception ? A mass of cells with potential to form a human isn’t quite murdering babies .

Follow the science.

https://www.liveaction.org/news/pelo...bortion-wrong/

[bgreene]

Your “ science “ Pipe is NOT accurate, shows pic of later term fetus , and is from a political biased source - anti abortion .

The FACTS vs your link are quite different as this NON POLITICAL link explains.

And ….I believe few women want to go through an abortion, it’s about the choice needed as is current federal and constitutional law.

https://www.factcheck.org/2015/05/do...n-at-20-weeks/

[scook]

Fact-check a non-political link? Of course you believe that. To quote you: hahaha

[bgreene]

Originally Posted by scook

Fact-check a non-political link? Of course you believe that. To quote you: hahaha

Yes indeed scook - I read Pipes link and it was both inaccurate and biased.
I’m not “ pro abortion “ ….I personally think it’s a sad and in many cases a very difficult decision BUT there are so many reasons that the law should remain as current - pro choice.

This is also how the majority of Americans feel.

[scook]

Everyone has a bias toward what they believe. Pipe’s source owns that they’re not in favor of abortion. Their science appears to be legitimate and much more current than that cited in your much older link. Given the speed with which science and medical technology is progressing, that’s quite relevant.

If polled, I’m confident that most, if not all of the fact check organization favor abortion. They don’t own their bias, but it comes through pretty clearly, e.g. one study author found it logical, based on nervous system development, that pain was felt, but said that wasn’t the thrust of his study - fact check used that statement to dismiss the idea.

The split between pro life and pro abortion is very close to half and half. Pro abortion has a couple of percentage points lead, but nowhere do I see it hitting 50%.

[bgreene]

Originally Posted by scook

Everyone has a bias toward what they believe. Pipe’s source owns that they’re not in favor of abortion. Their science appears to be legitimate and much more current than that cited in your much older link. Given the speed with which science and medical technology is progressing, that’s quite relevant.

If polled, I’m confident that most, if not all of the fact check organization favor abortion. They don’t own their bias, but it comes through pretty clearly, e.g. one study author found it logical, based on nervous system development, that pain was felt, but said that wasn’t the thrust of his study - fact check used that statement to dismiss the idea.

The split between pro life and pro abortion is very close to half and half. Pro abortion has a couple of percentage points lead, but nowhere do I see it hitting 50%.

Scook says “ nowhere does HE see it reaching 50 % ….WRONG .
OVER 50 % support Roe- Wade