Roe-Wade Woman’s right of choice

[Destroyer]

Abortion is just another nice word for murder. 53,000,000 babies have been murdered since Roe was adopted. It's been estimated that 70,000,000 million people died in WWII. So we are on track to murder more people (babies ARE people) than died in WWII... Anyone that feels pride in that is sick and should burn in hell..

Here's an interesting tid-bit of information. According to Planned Parenthood, 438 out of every 1000 abortions are African American. Just a little less than 50%. Yet African American's only account for 18% or the population. Perhaps if there was more responsibility taken that statistic might be more in line with national percentages. I mean, why use protection if you can just go and have an abortion whenever you want. Just sayin'

.

[bgreene]

Originally Posted by Destroyer

Abortion is just another nice word for murder. 53,000,000 babies have been murdered since Roe was adopted. It's been estimated that 70,000,000 million people died in WWII. So we are on track to murder more people (babies ARE people) than died in WWII... Anyone that feels pride in that is sick and should burn in hell..

Here's an interesting tid-bit of information. According to Planned Parenthood, 438 out of every 1000 abortions are African American. Just a little less than 50%. Yet African American's only account for 18% or the population. Perhaps if there was more responsibility taken that statistic might be more in line with national percentages. I mean, why use protection if you can just go and have an abortion whenever you want. Just sayin'

.

Approx 600,000 abortions per year. Who’s to adopt all those unwanted babies ?
Who’s going to pay the welfare ?
Life begins at conception ? A mass of cells with potential to form a human isn’t quite murdering babies .

[scook]

A mass of cells? Pretty well organized mass, given that barring a significant anomaly, ALWAYS turn into what you recognize as a human person.

You must have missed my post about the horrible adoption process - lots of normal, non-wealthy families want to adopt but it’s an impossibly difficult, heartbreaking and expensive process. Maybe work on that problem, as I have previously suggested and you are as usual pretending not to have heard, instead of murdering innocent children.

[bgreene]

Originally Posted by scook

A mass of cells? Pretty well organized mass, given that barring a significant anomaly, ALWAYS turn into what you recognize as a human person.

You must have missed my post about the horrible adoption process - lots of normal, non-wealthy families want to adopt but it’s an impossibly difficult, heartbreaking and expensive process. Maybe work on that problem, as I have previously suggested and you are as usual pretending not to have heard, instead of murdering innocent children.

Oh now it’s “ murdering children “ ……a mass of cells.
Roe-Wade CONSTITUTIONAL FEDERAL LAW until trumps court appointees go against the Will of the majority of Americans .

[Pipe_Dream]

Originally Posted by bgreene

Life begins at conception ?

Yes. Follow the science.

https://acpeds.org/position-statemen...an-life-begins

[Pipe_Dream]

Originally Posted by bgreene

Life begins at conception ? A mass of cells with potential to form a human isn’t quite murdering babies .

Follow the science.

https://www.liveaction.org/news/pelo...bortion-wrong/

[bgreene]

Your “ science “ Pipe is NOT accurate, shows pic of later term fetus , and is from a political biased source - anti abortion .

The FACTS vs your link are quite different as this NON POLITICAL link explains.

And ….I believe few women want to go through an abortion, it’s about the choice needed as is current federal and constitutional law.

https://www.factcheck.org/2015/05/do...n-at-20-weeks/

[scook]

Fact-check a non-political link? Of course you believe that. To quote you: hahaha

[bgreene]

Originally Posted by scook

Fact-check a non-political link? Of course you believe that. To quote you: hahaha

Yes indeed scook - I read Pipes link and it was both inaccurate and biased.
I’m not “ pro abortion “ ….I personally think it’s a sad and in many cases a very difficult decision BUT there are so many reasons that the law should remain as current - pro choice.

This is also how the majority of Americans feel.

[scook]

Everyone has a bias toward what they believe. Pipe’s source owns that they’re not in favor of abortion. Their science appears to be legitimate and much more current than that cited in your much older link. Given the speed with which science and medical technology is progressing, that’s quite relevant.

If polled, I’m confident that most, if not all of the fact check organization favor abortion. They don’t own their bias, but it comes through pretty clearly, e.g. one study author found it logical, based on nervous system development, that pain was felt, but said that wasn’t the thrust of his study - fact check used that statement to dismiss the idea.

The split between pro life and pro abortion is very close to half and half. Pro abortion has a couple of percentage points lead, but nowhere do I see it hitting 50%.