Trump - approx how many lies ?

[bgreene]

Originally Posted by Destroyer

I didn't provide an answer to your link because I knew that it, like almost every other piece of garbage you have provided, would be a biased hit piece and frankly, I've grown tired of answering those lies. But, in the interests of answering your supposed astounding link, I offer the following facts.

You provided a link to an article in Forbes where the very biased writer used data from the Washington Post and Politifact to write a highly false article.

Lets start with the statement that The Washington Post suggests President Donald Trump told 30,573 false or misleading statements over 4 years. [U]Based on this number, he is clearly a prolific liar. Notice the underlined words... There is no direct accusation, rather they "suggest" he told that amount. The article writer than takes it up a level and says that based on that number Trump is clearly a prolific liar. See? No where do either of them actual accuse. One "suggests, and the second one just says based on that. Totally misleading, but designed to make the reader think that Trump lied that many times. Some people fell for it so badly they thought that Trump had lied 40,000 times...

The writer than goes on to state that Trump told more lies than Obama and Brandon combined, but never shows any except 3. And even those three are just references, rather than the actual supposed "lie"

So I rate this article, like so many published by Greene, as nothing more than a carefully worded hit piece against Trump, designed to mislead the gullible. Out of a possible 5, I give it 5 Pinocchio's.

.

The hypocrite destroyer throwing the personal insults ……

[scook]

I read Destroyer’s post, and there’s not any hint of hypocrisy, nor any personal insult. You have the consistent practice of purposeful and, I believe, dishonestly confusing honest, accurate analysis of your posts with personal insults. That is what hypocrisy looks like.

[bgreene]

Originally Posted by scook

I read Destroyer’s post, and there’s not any hint of hypocrisy, nor any personal insult. You have the consistent practice of purposeful and, I believe, dishonestly confusing honest, accurate analysis of your posts with personal insults. That is what hypocrisy looks like.

Hypocrite - yes absolutely as he’s accused where there was no insult .
Hypocrite - absolutely coming from the poster of the most rude comments on this site.

I wrote on a few occasions “scookie have a cookie “. Oh my , such horror !” Oh the humanity “
Wonder if that made children cry, women blush, and men outraged !!!
Now compare that to your comments and of course destroyers history.

Hahaha funny and hypocritical .

[Destroyer]

Originally Posted by bgreene

The hypocrite destroyer throwing the personal insults ……

Really? Personal insult? Where? Where in my response was there a personal insult? Everything I stated was a fact! Please explain yourself Greene. If there was one I'll apologize, but since there is none I wouldn't hold my breath. I'll wait.

.

[bgreene]

Originally Posted by Destroyer

Really? Personal insult? Where? Where in my response was there a personal insult? Everything I stated was a fact! Please explain yourself Greene. If there was one I'll apologize, but since there is none I wouldn't hold my breath. I'll wait.

.

Good grief Charlie Brown - you lose track of your own disinformation.
That’s same as lying - you have to remember the lies.

Me - I post the truth and the facts which is easy . It never changes and I don’t have to track it.
Try reading your own past posts instead of asking me .
Hahaha you’re a “ funny guy “ and yes you amuse me……sometimes

[Destroyer]

Originally Posted by bgreene

Good grief Charlie Brown - you lose track of your own disinformation.
That’s same as lying - you have to remember the lies.

Me - I post the truth and the facts which is easy . It never changes and I don’t have to track it.
Try reading your own past posts instead of asking me .
Hahaha you’re a “ funny guy “ and yes you amuse me……sometimes

In other words, there was no personal insults and you just made it up. Otherwise you would have listed it, but instead you sidestepped the question.

.

[bgreene]

Originally Posted by Destroyer

In other words, there was no personal insults and you just made it up. Otherwise you would have listed it, but instead you sidestepped the question.

.

I don’t take time to look up all your posts …..although I did pull up your previous posts when you denied your much more disgusting posts .

[scook]

You wouldn't make any effort to look up anyone else's posts in the interest of intellectual honesty - you've demonstrated that repeatedly. You must feel great satisfaction form being disrespectful.

[bgreene]

Originally Posted by scook

You wouldn't make any effort to look up anyone else's posts in the interest of intellectual honesty - you've demonstrated that repeatedly. You must feel great satisfaction form being disrespectful.

It’s “ from being” ……not “form being . “

[Destroyer]

Originally Posted by bgreene

I don’t take time to look up all your posts …..although I did pull up your previous posts when you denied your much more disgusting posts .

Since the supposed insult was right here in this thread it's not really hard to look it up. Of course, it there was no insult, then yes, I can see why you would be reluctant to make further comments about it.

.