Roe-Wade Woman’s right of choice

[Destroyer]

Originally Posted by bgreene

Roe - Wade

Roe verses Wade and Casey verses Planned Parenthood.

.

[bgreene]

Originally Posted by Destroyer

Roe verses Wade and Casey verses Planned Parenthood.

.

Disgusting control freaks forcing abominable rules upon women and their families

[scook]

I agree that the states, where this issue is legally dealt with, should make reasonable provision for the physical health of the mother, and in cases of rape and incest, while remembering that a life is still being taken.

It’s despicable and abominable to be murdering human babies for convenience, after a woman DOESN’T exercise control over her body. It would be a productive effort to make adoption a reasonable thing for regular, non-wealthy people to do - there’s a big demand that’s not being accommodated, very much to the detriment of the babies and would be parents.

It’s pretty obvious that supporting adoption in a meaningful way is something that would undermine the left’s doctrine of unlimited abortion - they seem to think it’s better to spend their time attacking an adoption support organization and illegally harassing and threatening Supreme Court justices.

[bgreene]

Originally Posted by scook

I agree that the states, where this issue is legally dealt with, should make reasonable provision for the physical health of the mother, and in cases of rape and incest, while remembering that a life is still being taken.

It’s despicable and abominable to be murdering human babies for convenience, after a woman DOESN’T exercise control over her body. It would be a productive effort to make adoption a reasonable thing for regular, non-wealthy people to do - there’s a big demand that’s not being accommodated, very much to the detriment of the babies and would be parents.

It’s pretty obvious that supporting adoption in a meaningful way is something that would undermine the left’s doctrine of unlimited abortion - they seem to think it’s better to spend their time attacking an adoption support organization and illegally harassing and threatening Supreme Court justices.

Notice that you blame the WOMAN in your post.
Also notice that you don’t come out AGAINST inclusion of rape and incest in abortion laws, you instead call it “ reasonable provisions “ ….
Word games from scook.

I’m PRO CHOICE . No jargon, no word games .

[scook]

If you see word games anywhere in my post, there's something wrong with you.

I'm pro-life, with reasonable safeguards. You're pro murder of babies - no jargon or word games, I'll give you that. I find your cavalier attitude toward killing babies to be troubling and despicable.

As for blaming the woman, if a woman is concerned about having choice about her body, a good choice would be to not have unwanted babies. Birth control is cheap and available, and actually exercising control over what is done with and to her body is a very good practice to avoid becoming pregnant.

There are honest people arguing both sides of the issue, but wholesale killing of human beings isn't an ethical way of dealing with what is almost always irresponsible behavior.

[bgreene]

“ cavalier attitude “ says scook.

You’re wrong as usual - I’m pro choice , nothing “ cavalier “ about it .
Just my position…….which is also the majorities position.

[scook]

Certainly cavalier about human life, and I don’t think the majority supports your extreme lack of concern about murdering babies.

[Pipe_Dream]

Originally Posted by bgreene

I’m PRO CHOICE .

You're pro-killing human fetuses in the womb. We get it.

[Pipe_Dream]

Originally Posted by bgreene

Also notice that you don’t come out AGAINST inclusion of rape and incest in abortion laws, you instead call it “ reasonable provisions “ ….

[bgreene]

Originally Posted by Pipe_Dream

WRONG …..pro choice is PRO CHOICE …
Nice spin as usual