Roe-Wade Woman’s right of choice

[bgreene]

Originally Posted by scook

You sound like a kid who’s trying to impress people by using bigger words than he understands. Constitutional data, what’s that?

How is it not opinion (are you aware that what your constitutional expert wrote is actually called a legal opinion) to conclude that overturning one ruling which was based on certain inferences will automatically keep those inferences from ever being used again in more reasonable applications?

You are punching well above your weight, making these proclamations. You are, as has been pointed out repeatedly by several others, swallowing the liberal doctrine without critical thinking.

“ punching above my weight “ says scook as he poses as both judge and know it all.
Hahah go have a cookie - scookie

[Destroyer]

Originally Posted by bgreene

***8220; punching above my weight ***8220; says scook as he poses as both judge and know it all.
Hahah go have a cookie - scookie

I believe i cautioned you about personal insults. its unseemly. please stop

.

[bgreene]

Originally Posted by Destroyer

I believe i cautioned you about personal insults. its unseemly. please stop

.

You should have a cookie too destroyer and a glass of milk

[scook]

You should leave off your infantile attempts at arrogant condescension.

[bgreene]

Originally Posted by Destroyer

I believe i cautioned you about personal insults. its unseemly. please stop

.

Hah ….destroyer once again “ posing “ as Gentleman of this web site . Funny ! Hypocrite !

And of course - my encouraging scookie to have a cookie doesn’t compare to your posting history destroyer !!!
You should have a cookie too ! So funny are your silly posts .

[scook]

Yet another clumsy attempt at arrogant condescension. Doing that repeatedly doesn’t make you appear bright or to be a good faith participant in what COULD be a productive discussion.

[bgreene]

Originally Posted by scook

Yet another clumsy attempt at arrogant condescension. Doing that repeatedly doesn’t make you appear bright or to be a good faith participant in what COULD be a productive discussion.

Scookie - I’m not a great athlete …but I’m not clumsy either as you write associated with your non stop insults . Hahah.

Roe- Wade: supported to STAY as FEDERAL LAW by the MAJORITY OF AMERICANS .
That’s a FACT. Same as most all I post . FACTS and the TRUTH.

[Destroyer]

Originally Posted by bgreene

Scookie - I’m not a great athlete …but I’m not clumsy either as you write associated with your non stop insults . Hahah.

Roe- Wade: supported to STAY as FEDERAL LAW by the MAJORITY OF AMERICANS .
That’s a FACT. Same as most all I post . FACTS and the TRUTH.

I ASKED you to stop with the insults.

I'll make a deal with you. You show me where in the Constitution that it says that a woman, as protected by the Constitution, (As Roe V Wade claims) has the right to an abortion and I'll admit I was wrong and you were right. Deal?

However, if you cannot show me where it says that then you have to admit you were wrong and that I was right. OK?

.

[bgreene]

Originally Posted by Destroyer

I ASKED you to stop with the insults.

I'll make a deal with you. You show me where in the Constitution that it says that a woman, as protected by the Constitution, (As Roe V Wade claims) has the right to an abortion and I'll admit I was wrong and you were right. Deal?

However, if you cannot show me where it says that then you have to admit you were wrong and that I was right. OK?

.

There was no INSULT from me in my last post where you claim .
You just write that PRETENDING there was an insult .

[Destroyer]

Originally Posted by bgreene

There was no INSULT from me in my last post where you claim .
You just write that PRETENDING there was an insult .

I don't "pretend" anything.

And I notice you haven't responded to my offer for a deal. Remember, this thread is about Roe V Wade and a woman's right to kill a baby.

.