Trump now held in contempt of court

[bgreene]

Originally Posted by scook

If it is about Trump being held in contempt, a part of normal legal process, then is is also about normal and customary legal process, where a ruling can be appealed.

Your confirmation bias doesn't allow you to withhold your opinion until the situation is adjudicated. You WANT to believe anything negative about Trump, so you can't control your gleeful reporting of the "fact" that he's guilty of all manner of things and is therefor "avoiding" his punishment.

Wrong - just the facts scookie , just the facts

[scook]

The facts are as I stated them. If your understanding of the legal system is as limited as you demonstrate, you shouldn’t be starting a thread like this.

[bgreene]

Originally Posted by scook

The facts are as I stated them. If your understanding of the legal system is as limited as you demonstrate, you shouldn’t be starting a thread like this.

Judge rejected trumps appeal - FACT

[scook]

If you had any experience observing court proceedings, or any honest knowledge of the process, you would know that courts often get it wrong. Yes, it may be a fact that the judge ruled one way or another, but that certainly doesn’t make the ruling factually correct.

I’ve witnessed a clever (of course, dishonest) lawyer perpetuate a lie on a court that resulted in a completely unjust ruling that cost the defendant a huge amount of money, and another similar result, solely due to prejudice on the part of the judge.

Resisting document production and appealing rulings in a politically motivated witch hunt is pretty rational behavior. One can only imagine the support you would be throwing behind one of your lying democrats in a parallel situation.

[bgreene]

Originally Posted by scook

If you had any experience observing court proceedings, or any honest knowledge of the process, you would know that courts often get it wrong. Yes, it may be a fact that the judge ruled one way or another, but that certainly doesn’t make the ruling factually correct.

I’ve witnessed a clever (of course, dishonest) lawyer perpetuate a lie on a court that resulted in a completely unjust ruling that cost the defendant a huge amount of money, and another similar result, solely due to prejudice on the part of the judge.

Resisting document production and appealing rulings in a politically motivated witch hunt is pretty rational behavior. One can only imagine the support you would be throwing behind one of your lying democrats in a parallel situation.

The proven and obviously guilty are guilty scook - Democrat or Republican .

[scook]

Well, since it’s not proven until a court rules and then is subject to error on the part of the court, you are allowing your EXTREME confirmation bias the convict in your mind - only. Once again, completely unconcerned about the obviously guilty democrats - obvious through observation of their public behavior.

[bgreene]

Originally Posted by scook

Well, since it’s not proven until a court rules and then is subject to error on the part of the court, you are allowing your EXTREME confirmation bias the convict in your mind - only. Once again, completely unconcerned about the obviously guilty democrats - obvious through observation of their public behavior.

Scook - this thread is about the FACT that judge held Trump in contempt of court AND REJECTED his appeal. This is NOT a bias ….just a FACT.