![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Jan 6 investigation may deliver legally binding evidence linking trumps words and actions to supporting the insurrection.
Based on the public data it sure seems a solid case. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Couldn’t ask for a more perfect example.
__________________
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Again ambiguous post from you scook.
Me - I post clarity of message - direct, to the point. Back to the Jan 6 Insurrection attempt…….Trumps devious messaging and action / inaction that day not good. Not good at all. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
If you think that’s ambiguous, you should read others’ posts more carefully. You provide an endless string of posts that are 100% non responsive - it is your standard procedure and pretty much everyone has pointed it out many, many times.
This is yet another example.
__________________
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I reply to most every comment . This thread ref Jan 6 2021 …..when hundreds of trump supporters attacked our police, mostly smashed their way into our Capitol with intent to stop the Presidential transfer of powers with some making terroristic threats to hang our Vice President . All encouraged by Trump ( who tweeted be there- be wild) and Rudy Gilliani telling a crowd to have “ trial by combat” hours before the attack. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
You reply, but your replies are almost always not responsive to the post you’re “replying to”. When you know you’re wrong, you simple deflect, usually by just repeating one of your talking points (which are in most cases ludicrously biased nonsense).
__________________
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I’m hardly ever wrong because I fact check before posting . |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|