January 6, 2021

[scook]

Not so interested in the facts and truth I just posted and to which you provided not a single word of response.

While you’re going off on Destroyer repeatedly, incessantly, ad nauseam, consider the frustration any reasonable person would feel after responding with care, research, rationality and honesty, to your absurd posts, only to have his posts ignored, to be met with deflection and irrational nonsense. You behaved consistently as he described you - I might have chosen different words but in view of the egregiousness of your dishonest and arrogant behavior, I have to agree that you earned the designation.

None of this has to do with being Trump lovers, starry eyed or otherwise - it has 100% to do with you behaving like an intellectually dishonest jackass. I made a concerted effort to engage you in honest, productive discussion, but you weren’t having any of that. It would be a good thing for you to try to see yourself as others see you.

[bgreene]

Jan 6 investigation may deliver legally binding evidence linking trumps words and actions to supporting the insurrection.

Based on the public data it sure seems a solid case.

[scook]

Couldn’t ask for a more perfect example.

[bgreene]

Originally Posted by scook

Couldn’t ask for a more perfect example.

Again ambiguous post from you scook.

Me - I post clarity of message - direct, to the point.

Back to the Jan 6 Insurrection attempt…….Trumps devious messaging and action / inaction that day not good. Not good at all.

[scook]

If you think that’s ambiguous, you should read others’ posts more carefully. You provide an endless string of posts that are 100% non responsive - it is your standard procedure and pretty much everyone has pointed it out many, many times.

This is yet another example.

[bgreene]

Originally Posted by scook

If you think that’s ambiguous, you should read others’ posts more carefully. You provide an endless string of posts that are 100% non responsive - it is your standard procedure and pretty much everyone has pointed it out many, many times.

This is yet another example.

WRONG
I reply to most every comment .

This thread ref Jan 6 2021 …..when hundreds of trump supporters attacked our police, mostly smashed their way into our Capitol with intent to stop the Presidential transfer of powers with some making terroristic threats to hang our Vice President .

All encouraged by Trump ( who tweeted be there- be wild) and Rudy Gilliani telling a crowd to have “ trial by combat” hours before the attack.

[scook]

You reply, but your replies are almost always not responsive to the post you’re “replying to”. When you know you’re wrong, you simple deflect, usually by just repeating one of your talking points (which are in most cases ludicrously biased nonsense).