And the threat of nuclear war continues

[bgreene]

Originally Posted by Destroyer

Getting back to my original statement where I asked you to provide proof, (proof please) you provided what you claimed is proof. You failed to point out that the "clock" was advanced by 30 seconds by a bunch of people in the very beginning of Trumps Presidency in 2017 before he was ever given a chance to actually do anything. It was based almost solely on an opinion piece written by the NY Times. (A media outlet well known for it's extremely biased reporting against Trump). It has about as much validity as my saying that I've invented a new fishing lure that catches nothing but big fish on EVERY cast. In other words, ZERO.

So while indeed your statement was correct, and the clock was advanced, you once again provided "proof" of your statement that was based upon an opinion piece and not on scientific fact. (And for the record, the whole "Doomsday clock" scenario is nothing but a opinion postulated by people who may or may not have hidden agendas). It's about what I would expect from an elitist snob that thinks his opinions are all that counts because he thinks he knows better than everyone else.

.

The doomsday clock is an estimate based on many factors .
The FACT that the clock WAS ADVANCED under Trumps Presidency IS A FACT.
As usual I post facts and truth.

You want to add a bunch of yeh but thats fine but doesnt require insults .
You have a need to insult me with nearly every post oh well whatever.

[Destroyer]

Originally Posted by bgreene

The doomsday clock is an estimate based on many factors .
The FACT that the clock WAS ADVANCED under Trumps Presidency IS A FACT.
Thats it and as usual I post facts and truth.

You want to add a bunch of yeh but thats fine but doesnt require insults .
You have a need to insult me with nearly every post oh well whatever.

Hey!! I admitted that you were right and that the "supposed" clock was advanced. I also pointed out that it was really just an opinion postulated by a few people back in 2017 that hate Trump.

You usually post a bunch of BS opinion pieces that you claim are facts and truth.

Where did I insult you?

.

[bgreene]

Originally Posted by Destroyer

Hey!! I admitted that you were right and that the "supposed" clock was advanced. I also pointed out that it was really just an opinion postulated by a few people back in 2017 that hate Trump.

You usually post a bunch of BS opinion pieces that you claim are facts and truth.

Where did I insult you?

.

“ a bunch of BS opinion pieces” claims destroyer about the links and news I post.
Ok destroyer ….I realize that as our laws close in on the lying cheating con traitor trump you’ll get more desperate and nasty .

[Destroyer]

Originally Posted by bgreene

***8220; a bunch of BS opinion pieces***8221; claims destroyer about the links and news I post.
Ok destroyer ***8230;.I realize that as our laws close in on the lying cheating con traitor trump you***8217;ll get more desperate and nasty .

If the shoe fits, wear it Greene That wasn't an insult. It was my opinion of what you post. Surely you cannot deny me my opinion?


.

[bgreene]

Originally Posted by Destroyer

If the shoe fits, wear it Greene That wasn't an insult. It was my opinion of what you post. Surely you cannot deny me my opinion?


.

Yes destroyer I CERTAINLY DO REJECT YOUR STATED OPINIONS THAT I AM A
“ anus for sex “
“ feces “
“ POS “
And all the other nastyness you write.

[scook]

Destroyer, I think we are wasting our time responding to the stuff posted by bgreen. While I agree that the far-left nonsense needs to be pushed back against, I don't think anyone here is being swayed in any way by what he's posting.

Recent examples:

1) Proof that Fox is a sham - coming from a leftwing "fact checker" and doesn't have the wit to realize that they are including all statements, most of which are opinion pieces, not reported as news, and are probably factual anyway. As to Fox printing more retractions, if that is true, it indicates that they are more honest that other sources, who tend not to retract lies if they think they can get away with them.

2) Says he's not far left, but gleefully posts about anything the least bit negative about Trump or the Republicans. How stupid are the statements that Republicans now support violence and Trump encouraged violence against other Americans. A few nut jobs "saying" he "told them" to attack the capitol is proof of that? Completely ignoring the huge real threats to our democracy including attempts to dishonestly consolidate power with the socialist (and worse) democrats.

3) Trump WILL, not even MIGHT, do a Nazi Germany on our country - not even worth a response.

4) As you point out, his nonsense is legion.

I enjoy your posts of actual credible information and would miss them - my only point is that no one listens to the incompetent drivel he posts, so pushback isn't likely making much real difference. It was recreational, to a point, for me, but I'm thinking again that it's a waste of my time. High marks to you for consistent corrections of the record.

[bgreene]

Scook

1. I don’t “ gleefully “ report the facts and truth but I do so proudly as an honest American supporting our Constitution and our Democracy .

2. My reference to Trumps APPROACH following Hitlers model is accurate as it applies to :
A. Labeling a so called enemy ( any non supporters included)
B. Attaching label of so called enemies with LIES repeated again and again .
C. Try to seize power attached with nationalism as excuse for over riding existing systems

3. Good if your not interested and “ wasting your time “ replying - good - stop posting .
I won’t stop posting the truth and the facts …except when you and destroyer get nasty and vulgar then I’ll reply as appropriate .

But good - I support your position to stop replying to my factual threads and posts.

[Destroyer]

Originally Posted by scook

Destroyer, I think we are wasting our time responding to the stuff posted by bgreen. While I agree that the far-left nonsense needs to be pushed back against, I don't think anyone here is being swayed in any way by what he's posting.

Recent examples:

1) Proof that Fox is a sham - coming from a leftwing "fact checker" and doesn't have the wit to realize that they are including all statements, most of which are opinion pieces, not reported as news, and are probably factual anyway. As to Fox printing more retractions, if that is true, it indicates that they are more honest that other sources, who tend not to retract lies if they think they can get away with them.

2) Says he's not far left, but gleefully posts about anything the least bit negative about Trump or the Republicans. How stupid are the statements that Republicans now support violence and Trump encouraged violence against other Americans. A few nut jobs "saying" he "told them" to attack the capitol is proof of that? Completely ignoring the huge real threats to our democracy including attempts to dishonestly consolidate power with the socialist (and worse) democrats.

3) Trump WILL, not even MIGHT, do a Nazi Germany on our country - not even worth a response.

4) As you point out, his nonsense is legion.

I enjoy your posts of actual credible information and would miss them - my only point is that no one listens to the incompetent drivel he posts, so pushback isn't likely making much real difference. It was recreational, to a point, for me, but I'm thinking again that it's a waste of my time. High marks to you for consistent corrections of the record.

Thank you for the complement(s). I take that as high praise coming from you. You may have noticed that I've been here a little less often, for much the same reason that you just voiced. It's hard arguing with an idiot day after day. So I'm trying to keep my visits to this forum thread down to just a couple of times a week. I still stop in almost every day. I just don't come here. You might want to adopt the same attitude.