The siege on our Capitol

[bgreene]

Originally Posted by scook

Unless you apply the “justice being blind” and EQUAL protection concepts, looking at the despicable disparity of prosecution between the bad actors at the capitol and the repeat offending domestic terrorists who rioted for months on end. If you did that honestly, you would have to conclude that the capitol offenders are getting hugely unfair sentences by comparison.

Pitiful excuse to try and cover for what happened at our Capitol - the biggest threat to our democracy since the civil war.
So don’t throw out the “ yeh but “ . Urban violence that occurred was very bad.

Does NOT cover for excuse these Insurrectionists hell bent on hanging our Vice President and stopping the transfer of power.

[scook]

There is nothing in my post that remotely excuses the violence at the capitol. It only points out the vast disparity and, I believe hypocrisy, in the application of the law.

If you believe the capitol violence was the greatest threat to our democracy since the civil war, you shouldn’t be out without adult supervision - that is an absolutely ludicrous statement. Do you honestly believe there was ANY likelihood of the transfer of power being stopped?

[bgreene]

Originally Posted by scook

There is nothing in my post that remotely excuses the violence at the capitol. It only points out the vast disparity and, I believe hypocrisy, in the application of the law.

If you believe the capitol violence was the greatest threat to our democracy since the civil war, you shouldn’t be out without adult supervision - that is an absolutely ludicrous statement. Do you honestly believe there was ANY likelihood of the transfer of power being stopped?

More BS from you destroyer - you previously referred to the insurrectionist attack attempt to overthrow our government as “ a small group that got roudy”

Roust is what you called them- those that smashed their way through police into our Capitol to try and stop our peaceful system of transfer of power.

You’re on the wrong side of history destroyer - like trying to defend the Natzi movement .

[bgreene]

Originally Posted by scook

There is nothing in my post that remotely excuses the violence at the capitol. It only points out the vast disparity and, I believe hypocrisy, in the application of the law.

If you believe the capitol violence was the greatest threat to our democracy since the civil war, you shouldn’t be out without adult supervision - that is an absolutely ludicrous statement. Do you honestly believe there was ANY likelihood of the transfer of power being stopped?

More BS from you destroyer - you previously referred to the insurrectionist attack attempt to overthrow our government as a small group that got roudy

Roudy is what you called them- those that smashed their way through police into our Capitol to try and stop our peaceful system of transfer of power.

You’re on the wrong side of history destroyer - like trying to defend the Natzi movement .

[Destroyer]

Originally Posted by bgreene

More BS from you destroyer - you previously referred to the insurrectionist attack attempt to overthrow our government as a small group that got roudy

Roudy is what you called them- those that smashed their way through police into our Capitol to try and stop our peaceful system of transfer of power.

You’re on the wrong side of history destroyer - like trying to defend the Natzi movement .

For the love of God, WILL YOU PLEASE LEARN TO SPELL!!! It's Nazi, NOT Natzi.

And for the (hopefully) last time when you compare 550 to 20,000+ then YES it was a small group!!! Less than 5%

.

[scook]

Another thing you should do is read the posts before you respond to them. The post you attribute to Destroyer is my post and it neither contains ANY BS, nor are ANY of your allegations in reference to it in ANY way truthful.

[bgreene]

Originally Posted by scook

Another thing you should do is read the posts before you respond to them. The post you attribute to Destroyer is my post and it neither contains ANY BS, nor are ANY of your allegations in reference to it in ANY way truthful.

You reference trumps speech - TRUMP LIED IN HIS SPEECH saying he immediately sent in the National Guard to restore peace. LIAR !!!! Trump did nothing for hours while the police are heard on radio begging for help !!!! It wasnt even trump who sent the help .
Trumps a bold faced LIAR

Then trump conceded his loss by the way

[scook]

No, I didn’t reference Trump’s or anyone else’s speech. All of the things in this and your previous response are completely non responsive to what I posted both times.

[bgreene]

Originally Posted by Destroyer

For the love of God, WILL YOU PLEASE LEARN TO SPELL!!! It's Nazi, NOT Natzi.

And for the (hopefully) last time when you compare 550 to 20,000+ then YES it was a small group!!! Less than 5%

.

Here’s destroyer using GOD’s name and BOLD type acting all upset because I misspelled Nazi .
Destroyer - poster of lots of vulgarity pretending it’s a big deal about a misspelled word. As if his nasty, vulgar, cursing posts somehow ok because he didn’t misspell the F word …..

[Destroyer]

Originally Posted by bgreene

Here’s destroyer using GOD’s name and BOLD type acting all upset because I misspelled Nazi .
Destroyer - poster of lots of vulgarity pretending it’s a big deal about a misspelled word. As if his nasty, vulgar, cursing posts somehow ok because he didn’t misspell the F word …..

It's not so much that you misspelled Nazi, it's that you have done it repeatedly, even after being corrected.

Have you never heard of spell check? Do you know what it means when you mistype a word and there's a red line under it?

As for posting lots of vulgarity, I'm afraid that you're mistaken (again). Let's see.... You say I've made lots of vulgar, cursing, nasty posts. Hmmm.... I've made almost 7000 posts in these forums, and maybe in total 20 of them might have contained a word or phrase that some people might consider as rude or vulgar. That's hardly "lots" as you call it. But you know what? ANY time I've used words or phrases like that the person that I've addressed them to deserved them and more. And I usually used them in response to some name calling that the person had called me. So I really don't give a flying fickle finger of fate if they upset you. Poor baby....

All you seem to be capable of doing is jumping on a few words someone posts and you completely ignore the subject of the post. Seriously, I'm beginning to wonder if you have even the slightest concept of what a debate is or how to conduct yourself while in one.
.