No voter fraud?

[oteps]

Originally Posted by bgreene

Everything trump is based on the facts that hes a lying cheating con man traitor to America.
No voter fraud - the fraud is trump himself

Everything you say Trump did joe is doing now. You keep saying there was no voter fraud. Maybe there wasnt. But if you go into a store and the owner says "hey, your stole a snickers bar and put it in your pocket" and you refuse to empty your pockets , how does that make you look?

[bgreene]

Originally Posted by oteps

Everything you say Trump did joe is doing now. You keep saying there was no voter fraud. Maybe there wasnt. But if you go into a store and the owner says "hey, your stole a snickers bar and put it in your pocket" and you refuse to empty your pockets , how does that make you look?

There was no refusal to prove the resulting …..
1. Trump lawyers went to courts to plead their case - thrown out for lack of evidence.
That’s known as a frivolous law suit.

2. Re counts and audits actually resulted in the same outcome - BIDEN won

3. Only refusal was REPUBLICAN law makers who refused to cheat for Trump - he asked th to come up with votes they didnt have

[Destroyer]

Originally Posted by bgreene

There was no refusal to prove the resulting …..
1. Trump lawyers went to courts to plead their case - thrown out for lack of evidence.
That’s known as a frivolous law suit.

2. Re counts and audits actually resulted in the same outcome - BIDEN won

3. Only refusal was REPUBLICAN law makers who refused to cheat for Trump - he asked th to come up with votes they didnt have

1) MOST of the lawsuits that were dismissed by the courts were not dismissed due to lack of evidence. They were dismissed with the reason they were filed too late because the courts ruled that the time period started at the beginning of the campaign, not at the actual election date which was months later. Yes, some were dismissed because of lack of evidence, but when the object of the lawsuit is to OBTAIN evidence, and the lawsuit is rejected it's a Catch-22 situation. You need the evidence to file a lawsuit, and the reason for the lawsuit is to get the evidence you need.

2) Recounts only resulted in the same outcome because questionable votes, (like the 57,000 in AZ) were not allowed to be scrutinized.

3) Once again you postulate the lie that President Trump asked them to lie. In fact, he never asked them to do any such thing. Even the link that you provided as proof never had any such verbiage on it.

.

[oteps]

there was no recounts or audits in PA, Why do you keep lying that there was?

[bgreene]

Originally Posted by oteps

there was no recounts or audits in PA, Why do you keep lying that there was?

Show me where I specifically discussed Pennsylvania ?
There was no recount there because BIDEN WON by wide enough margin under the laws.

[oteps]

So now you change your story? U said the votes have been counted and recounted. But when someone questions you on your "facts" you change what you said.
So now there was no recount?

[bgreene]

Originally Posted by oteps

So now you change your story? U said the votes have been counted and recounted. But when someone questions you on your "facts" you change what you said.
So now there was no recount?

Try READING and LEARN the status of recounts that costing us tax payers $ millions of wasted money.
Arizona for example - the county trump demanded that he won recount added up to even BIGGER win by a few votes for Biden that before the recount.
Trump lost fair and square, but rather than do the right thing for country - hes a lying cheating con man traitor


https://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...ef8_story.html