|
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Most obvious visual changes between the 20 and the 21 are the stern "bubble" where the outboard mounts and the curved side windows on the 21. Other than that I believe they are identical. Same number of "steps" on the hull, same deep vee, same wide flair. etc.
__________________
1987 V20 w/1987 150HP Yamaha on a Shoreland'r Trailer 1978 16.5 Airslot w/1996 120HP Force on a Four Winns trailer 1996 V21 w/1993 200HP Mercury on a Shoreline Trailer All towed by a 5.7L Hemi Durango. If God didn't have a purpose for us we wouldn't be here, so Live simply, Love generously, Care deeply, Speak kindly. (Leave the rest to God)  Silence, in the face of evil, is itself evil. Not to speak is to speak, not to act is to act. God will not hold us guiltless. 
|
|
#2
12-04-2018, 04:45 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Mostly...V21s are newer so they got that going for them.
Hull is the same. Bumped out motor well means less motor well in the cockpit...thats a real plus. Cap is different. Sliding hatch is different. some have molded seats/livewell. No Teak. If I were looking again, I'd look for a V21 cuddy.
__________________
1984 V20 "Express" & 2003 Suzuki DF140 (SOLD!) 2000 GradyWhite 265 Express YouTube/SkunkBoat https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC4F...znGospVOD6EJuw Transom Rebuild https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EEz94NbKCh0 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oe_ZmPOUCNc
|
|
#3
12-07-2018, 03:26 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
20 vs 21..I like the versatility of the 20..wide open from dash to stern/...my 21 had tanks and seat mounts molded in, so cuts down on open floor space...if you don't want to have that changability, the 21 is a good choice, but you won't go wrong w/either
__________________
'74 V-20/ BF 150 '95 V-21/ BF 150 '84 V-20/ 200 2.4 Merc '87 V-20/'18 F150 Yamaha 
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
