Soldier denied service at Muslim owned service station

[willy]

No one altered the video, and i saw the whole speech from beginning to end. Unlike some I get my info from multiple sources and I do not drink either version of the Kool Aid.
If you watch his whole speech and you sit down and think about how you just heard that from an American President you will realize that we are in grave danger from a socialist/progressive sh!tbird who has an agenda to turn this country into something Karl Marx would appreciate.
If you don't see that then you do not know history, and you are driving with blinders on.
The reasons for that, well we all have to decide for ourselves.

[Destroyer]

I'm continually amazed that people are so STUPID as to fall for the BS that the current administration is trying to paint Mitt Romney with.

[jeffmo]

Originally Posted by Destroyer

I'm continually amazed that people are so STUPID as to fall for the BS that the current administration is trying to paint Mitt Romney with.

my opinion comes from some of what romney has said and/or done not from any commercials about him or anything the Presidents has said about him.
In my line of work we've seen a serious short staffing issues for about 10 years now and it's made the job alot more dangerous.Romney doesn't believe they should be hired back.
Btw,call it however you like but the ultra conservatives have enough stupidity to go around also.

[Destroyer]

Originally Posted by jeffmo

my opinion comes from some of what romney has said and/or done not from any commercials about him or anything the Presidents has said about him.
In my line of work we've seen a serious short staffing issues for about 10 years now and it's made the job alot more dangerous.Romney doesn't believe they should be hired back.
Btw,call it however you like but the ultra conservatives have enough stupidity to go around also.

You said that Romney doesn't believe they should be hired back. How do you know this? I've not seen one comment by Romney or any of his staffers concerning the hiring or firing of firefighters. Where did you hear that? Understand, I'm not arguing with you about manpower shortfalls, I'm just saying that I haven't seen any comments by Romney on that subject. (And by the way, this is a man [Romney] that is directly responsible for saving over 40,000 American jobs [union and non-union alike] and 73 American companies that would otherwise be out of business right now... including Staples and the third largest steel maker in the US.) So go tell those people that are working right now because of him that Romney is bad for business.

As for your comment about ultra-conservatives, of course there are some that are extreme in their thinking, but hardly in the same catagory or numbers as the mass of people that think that Obama is actually doing good. I'll stand by my original comment.

[jeffmo]

Originally Posted by Destroyer

You said that Romney doesn't believe they should be hired back. How do you know this? I've not seen one comment by Romney or any of his staffers concerning the hiring or firing of firefighters. Where did you hear that? Understand, I'm not arguing with you about manpower shortfalls, I'm just saying that I haven't seen any comments by Romney on that subject. (And by the way, this is a man [Romney] that is directly responsible for saving over 40,000 American jobs [union and non-union alike] and 73 American companies that would otherwise be out of business right now... including Staples and the third largest steel maker in the US.) So go tell those people that are working right now because of him that Romney is bad for business.

As for your comment about ultra-conservatives, of course there are some that are extreme in their thinking, but hardly in the same catagory or numbers as the mass of people that think that Obama is actually doing good. I'll stand by my original comment.

Well,it wasn't just firefighters.it was also teachers and police officers.What the President wanted to do was to use some federal money to re-hire people in those professions who had been laid off due to the economy.Romney doesn't think it should happen.Neither Obama or Romney can hire or fire anyone in those professions but,federal money could be used to re-hire and get staffing back up to safe levels.I witnessed first hand what the current mindset of the republican party is when it comes to middle class public sector workers.I think that they are simply trying to push the ALEC agenda and the result would be that MANY middle class workers would see their pay and benefits cut while they simply would get richer.I don't mind people becoming rich through hard work but when they want to do it by hurting the quality of life of other people then I say that it's wrong.


I thought I'd list a few sources on Romneys statement so credibility wouldn't be an issue.

And I'll stand by my position also!
I think i should say that I'm a life long democrat who has a middle of the road outlook on most issues and politics.Like I've said before,the ultra righties and ultra-lefties are the ones ruining this nation.there's no compromise in either party and very little gets done because of it.
In the last election McCain was going to get my vote until he announced his choice of running mate.He recently spoke out about Michelle Bachmann and her attitude.HE is the exact type of politician we need many more of in this country.
I certainly don't agree wit every decision Obama has made but I think that He will try to look out for the average person far better than Romney ever would.

[Destroyer]

Originally Posted by jeffmo

I thought I'd list a few sources on Romneys statement so credibility wouldn't be an issue. I await your sources

And I'll stand by my position also! No one said you shouldn't...just keep an open mind to what BOTH sides are saying and doing.

I think i should say that I'm a life long democrat (it shows)who has a middle of the road outlook on most issues and politics.Like I've said before,the ultra righties and ultra-lefties are the ones ruining this nation.there's no compromise in either party and very little gets done because of it. Oh, you mean like the Dems in the senate who haven't brought up a budget for a vote in over 3 YEARS?
In the last election McCain was going to get my vote until he announced his choice of running mate. She was the best part of his inept, tepid "campaign" He recently spoke out about Michelle Bachmann and her attitude. And she recently spoke out about his comments and his lack of an attitude. HE is the exact type of politician we need many more of in this country. OMG... I certainly do NOT agree with that statement.. he's an utter disaster, He's so wishy-washy it's an embarasement. I can't wait for him to be voted out of office.
I certainly don't agree with every decision Obama has made but I think that He will try to look out for the average person far better than Romney ever would. Depends on what you mean by "look out for".. If by "look out for" you mean rule or dictate over, then yes, I agree that Obama will "look out for" the average person much more than Romney will. If, on the other hand, by "look out for" you mean put people back to work, help them stand on their own two feet with less government and help them succeed in their lives, then I think your only choice is Romney.

.

[Destroyer]

Originally Posted by jeffmo

What the President wanted to do was to use some federal money to re-hire people in those professions who had been laid off due to the economy. Romney doesn't think it should happen. Neither Obama or Romney can hire or fire anyone in those professions but,federal money could be used to re-hire and get staffing back up to safe levels. And now you have to ask yourself... WHY were those jobs let go in the first place? I'm guessing from your comments that money was the main issue... so what happens when the Federal Money that Obama wanted to use runs out? Do the people that were rehired simply get fired again? Or do you think that we (the taxpayers) should pay for them in perpetuity? Maybe if the people that hired them in the first place had kept the budgets tight none of this would have happened. OVERSPENDING is what got them fired, and NOTHING, other than fiscal restraint will get them back. I think that they are simply trying to push the ALEC agenda and the result would be that MANY middle class workers would see their pay and benefits cut while they simply would get richer. Who are the "they" people that you mentioned just now? I don't mind people becoming rich through hard work Good, because that's exactly what Romney did....Glad we agree. but when they want to do it by hurting the quality of life of other people then I say that it's wrong. And I agree with you completely. Protecting 40,000 American jobs and 73 American companies is certainly helping the quality of life for those people...wouldn't you agree?

.

[jeffmo]

sorry,had to take off for a while!


Romney said of Obama, ***8220;he wants another stimulus, he wants to hire more government workers. He says we need more firemen, more policemen, more teachers. Did he not get the message of Wisconsin? The American people did. It***8217;s time for us to cut back on government and help the American people.***8221;
The intent was to re-hire some that had been laid off.

http://thinkprogress.org/economy/201...more-teachers/

http://takingnote.blogs.nytimes.com/...d-no-teachers/

http://open.salon.com/blog/a_patriot...n_and_teachers

http://www.businessinsider.com/barac...olice-teachers

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics...aign-wont-say/

[jeffmo]

the safety forces positions were lost when the economy went south.it wasn't because of poor planning.IF that were the case then we should NEVER add to safety forces because no one will ever have the ability to tell when we are going to have bad times.Over the last 10 years run volumnes have steadily increased but staffing has been reduced.MOST departments i'm aware of now bill for EMS services which means that they are doing more with less.Exactly how much more would you say we should concede to where it comes to our safety?

MAYBE,if we simply eliminated wasteful spending at ALL levels of gov't we wouldn't have had to see safety forces reduced to unsafe levels.
Now,blame it on whoever you'd like to but when jobs left our country for foreign soil THAT'S when our troubles began.I don't care who would have ended up in the whitehouse,turning and economy around that took years to go bad would be like stopping a train on a dime....it'll never happen.
So what's so bad about being a democrat w/ middle of the road views that you feel the need to say "it shows"??