|
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
In my expierences, its that the rochester is cheaper and easier to work on than a holley. I had a holley 650 vs on an old hotrod and was constantly blowing the power valve. I put a rochester 4 bbl on it and never had another carburation issue.
__________________
'86 V20 Cuddy w/ '86 Yamaha 200  Take a kid fishing
|
|
#2
07-06-2008, 02:15 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Nothing wrong with a HOLLEY, the ROCHESTERS are just cheaper and more plentiful. And I would give the economy edge to the ROCHESTER over the HOLLEY as well. HOLLEY'S are nice simple carbs, about as basic as you can get. The ROCHESTERS are a little harder to work on, but still not bad. Plus in your HP range the ROCHESTER would probably be better suited. And 2 barrel HOLLEYS in marine apps aren't very plentiful as the ROCHESTER in a 2 barrel was more widely used.
__________________
2011 SUNDANCE B20CCR SKIFF, 2011 YAMAHA 90HP 4 STROKE, 2011 KARAVAN SINGLE AXLE ALUMINUM TRAILER, LOWRANCE ELITE-7 HDI, MINN KOTA RIPTIDE TROLLING MOTOR 2000CC HYDRA-SPORT 225+HP EVINRUDE SOLD  AND THE PINK JEEP!!!! R.I.P. http://www.wellcraftv20.com/communit...ad.php?t=11664 
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
