|
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Rpm
What I am worried about is that a 19 pitch might be too steep and that I should be looking for a 17 or even a 15 pitch. Yesterday another guy told me that the 302 was a very "short" engine and that it did better in low RPM's generating a lot of torque rather than in high RPM's.
As far as the year of the engine I am not sure but probably mid or late 80's. The hull is originaly 1967. thanks again 
|
|
#2
06-30-2008, 06:18 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Not sure on the 302, but I worked on an old 351 before and it's WOT was 3800-4200.
__________________
2011 SUNDANCE B20CCR SKIFF, 2011 YAMAHA 90HP 4 STROKE, 2011 KARAVAN SINGLE AXLE ALUMINUM TRAILER, LOWRANCE ELITE-7 HDI, MINN KOTA RIPTIDE TROLLING MOTOR 2000CC HYDRA-SPORT 225+HP EVINRUDE SOLD  AND THE PINK JEEP!!!! R.I.P. http://www.wellcraftv20.com/communit...ad.php?t=11664 
|
|
#3
07-03-2008, 08:11 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Thats the line that Ford guys will use to explain their lack of horsepower.
__________________
*************************************** Stay Safe!  Sold - 1984 V-20 Cuddy with a 2003 Johnson 140 hp gas sippin 4-stroke. 1995 Ranger 250C with a 2015 Suzuki 300 hp 4-stroke.
|
|
#4
07-03-2008, 11:40 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
the mercruiser 302's were 888's. they used the 351 cam, heads, and firing order, they were rated at 188 hp. The OMC 302s were only rated at 170. 4200-4400 soounds right, make sure you are using an accurate tach to check rpm by
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
