For you Snopes guys

[willy]

Before you fellows who rely on Snopes to get you the facts go any further, you should be aware that this is the third time I personally have seen Snopes caught in a intentional lie. They are human and they also have agendas.
Check it out and keep it in mind, thought you all should see the latest.

I went to Snopes to check this out and they said it was false and there were no such dockets so I googled the supreme court, typed in Obama Kagan , and guess what? Yep you got it. Snopes lied. Everyone of those dockets are there. So here is what I wrote Snopes:



WND article about Elena Kagan and Barak Obama dockets. The information you have posted stating that there were no such cases as claimed by WND and the examples you gave are blatently false. I went directly to the Supreme courts website, typed in Obama Kagan and immediately came up with all of the dockets that WND made reference too. I have long suspected that you really slant things but this was really shocking.
Thank You, I hope you will be much more truthful in the future,


Bet you didn't know this....




Kagan was representing Obama in all the petitions to prove his citizenship. Now she may help rule on them.
Folks, this is really ugly.




Chicago Politics, and the beat goes on and on and on...

Once again the Senate sold us out.Well, someone figured out why Obamanominated Elana Kagan for the Supreme Court.... Pull up the Supreme Courts website, go to the docket and search for Obama. She was the Solicitor General for all the suits against him filed with the Supreme Court to show proof of natural born citizenship. Heowed her big time. All of the requests were denied of course. They were never heard. It just keeps getting deeper and deeper, doesn't it? The American people mean nothing any longer.. It's all about payback time for those that compromised themselves to elect someone that really has no true right to even be there. We should be getting so sick of all of this nonsense.
Here are some websites of the Supreme Court Docket:
You can look up some of these hearings and guess what? ElanaKagan is the attorney representing Obama! Check out these examples:
http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.a...es/09-8857.htmhttp://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.a...es/09-6790.htmhttp://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.a...les/09-724.htmhttp://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.a...s/08-10382.htm

[garagenc]

WTF sounds like his sh*t again

[willy]

It is, but the main point here is do not rely on any one source, like I said this is the third time where Snopes has shot down a query from people on some political situation where they have lied, or at least severly twisted the truth in what can only be agenda based.
There was a story in some of the papers about this in the early spring.

[nipper]

Don't know if you or someone else was the author of the original email, but Snopes has a response. http://www.snopes.com/info/notes/kagan.asp

[willy]

After this third episode, that I know of, I could not care less what response Snopes people have. That is just me everyone has to make their own decision obviously but i do not trust them with any political based calls any more.

[THEFERMANATOR]

There was a pic awhile back of the people behind snopes, and lets just say it didn't jump out at yeah as being 2 people who are into factual info. The couple that are behind snopes is a pair of comifornia hippies all growed out. There is no other way to describe em. And this is just a small piece of there agenda that they have been pushing for quite some time. There is a reason that even schools won't accept snopes and wikipedia as references, as even they know it is largely BS from em.

[nipper]

Willy, with all due respect, you need to keep an open mind. If you read both Snopes articles, there was never any denial that the nine supreme court dockets existed. In fact, Snopes says that each of them did exist, but then goes on to explain how not one of the 9 cases had anything to do with President Obama's eligibility to serve as President. Sure, Snopes answered "False", but it was not to the question of whether the cases existed on the Supreme Court's docket, but rather, whether those cases lend any credence to the theory that Justice Kagan was appointed because President Obama owed her "big time" for serving as his counsel on the cases. And, by the way, that is what the Solicitor General does--represent the government in cases filed before the Supreme Court. The SG has no choice in the matter.

I rarely refer to Snopes and certainly do not accept whatever is said on Snopes at face value. However, I think you are accusing them here of intentionally lying when, if you read what they said, they did not.

[willy]

You know something Nipper, you are right. I should be open minded and I have tried with several of the so called sources and the spins everything has on them. Snopes has been one of those.
I also am absolutely anti Press and the so called major media outlets like the AP, CBS,NBC,CNN,New york Slime and most of the other major market papers.
I will tell you why
They have an agenda, they stopped being journalists a long time ago.
Here is a classic example.
My sister just sent me the pics from a local small paper in Chicago, remember when the Obamination went to his home town a week or two ago. Did you see any reports of what happened there?
No, it either was not covered at all or it was given a passing mention on page 18.
There thousands and thousands of regular Joe and Josephines all over the down town, the place was shut down with protesters carrying all the tea party type signs, calling on congress and the Obamination to stop destroying this country.
They had to re-route the annointed one twice because of the huge number there.
Did you see all the pics on the news?
Did you see the reporting of approximatley one half million people on 8/28. They did everything they could to try and demonize, criticize, and under estimate what happened that great day on the Nations lawn.But there was a ton of coverage on the response from the race baiter Sharpton and his 2500 people protesting what those Americans did on 8/28 and it was given equal coverage all over the news and in some cases he was given more air time than Beck's 8/28 call to honor and faith on the mall.
There is one example after another going on and I don't trust them anymore.
Americans are waking up and the Snopes of the world had better get it right without the spin or they are thru

[RWilson2526]

....and Fox News is 100% unbiased factual information with no spin or agenda....

[willy]

I don't think so, but I at least get both sides on every issue presented, now if you are talking about the opinion shows that is different, hannity for example is just that, he is a opinion show.
And apparently these opinions and the news reporting in general is way up there as far trustworthyness at least as far as the American people are concerned because they are now and have been for years the largest listening audience in the country, literally more than all the rest combined.
That says a lot in my book when the people have decided like that.