[willy]

Well put but I would add a caveat ; his failure in Irag was not in going but falure to listen to his troops on the ground and not the political opposition and get the numbers they needed to do the job.
His failure in the middle east is in not laying the law down and being more firm with Iran and Syria, along with allowing Saudi Arabia to continue their sins and turning a blind eye to it.
Domestically he has done just what the people elected him to do and has cut our taxes with more to come, the economy has been kept strong and he has stood by his principles in the face of withering condemnation from the People Republic News Media that so many here seem to trust in.
He is no where near perfect but the alternatives we were given in the past two presidential elections were down right shamefull, the were basically socialists in the guise of democrats, so much so large numbers of their own party abandoned them.
They had no backbone or respect for this country's soldiers and their core values and beliefs were whatever George Soros or the New York Times said it was. Period,
As much as I agree with Mac and Ozzie on a general consensus that we have a lot of trouble the way things are being done, the fact is we have not had any good alternatives and as had been said before we are always voting for the lesser of two evils.
I would rather have a man that at least has consistent principles that I generally agree with than something much less than a man that has been placed up as an alternative. And anyone in this country that believes we would have prosecuted the war on the Jihadist's and the terrorists in general and that we would not have been attacked again in this country over the past six years, or that our taxes would not be thru the roof right now under a Kerry or 'Gore needs to put down the crack pipe and go outside and take a deep breath of reality.
JMHO