View Single Post
  #9  
Unread 01-23-2007, 01:59 AM
THEFERMANATOR's Avatar
THEFERMANATOR THEFERMANATOR is offline
God
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Zephyrhills Fl
Posts: 7,206
Send a message via AIM to THEFERMANATOR
Default Re: Crossflow vs. Looper

LOOPERS tend to pull better up high and get slightly better milage. CROSSFLOWS pull good off idle but run out up high. OMC increased the bore on the loopers for 88 due to the lack of bottom end grunt(no replacement for displacement). OMC offered the 1.6L(crossflow) sea-drive all the way up to 89 that I've seen. 1.6L and 2.4L and 2.6L were crossflows, 1.8L 2L 2.7L 3L 3.6L and 4L SEA-DRIVES were loopers.

I personally can attest to the power potential that a small-bore looper can make though. The 19' COBRA bowrider in my sigg has run 53 MPH and was still climbing(but chine walking severely and no steering control). The same boat with a 150HP SUZUKI super six BASS pro edition ran 53 as well, and they were the same engine as a 225HP SUZUKI with a lower gear ratio foot.
__________________
2011 SUNDANCE B20CCR SKIFF, 2011 YAMAHA 90HP 4 STROKE, 2011 KARAVAN SINGLE AXLE ALUMINUM TRAILER, LOWRANCE ELITE-7 HDI, MINN KOTA RIPTIDE TROLLING MOTOR

2000CC HYDRA-SPORT 225+HP EVINRUDE SOLD

AND THE PINK JEEP!!!! R.I.P.
http://www.wellcraftv20.com/communit...ad.php?t=11664
Reply With Quote