View Single Post
  #5  
Unread 05-13-2022, 02:28 AM
bgreene bgreene is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Cherry Hill, NJ
Posts: 6,461
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Destroyer View Post
More opinion with zero factual evidence. What IS factual is that Trump has already provided over one million pages of documents to that kangaroo court. I would tend to think if he had the documents (whatever they are) he would have provided them also. If the court thinks that the National Archives has the documents why didn't they just subpoena them in the beginning instead of making Trump look for them and pay that fine? (or maybe the whole idea was to make trump look bad and pay money?)

.
That’s your opinion - the law and the judge says otherwise
Reply With Quote