You sound like a kid who’s trying to impress people by using bigger words than he understands. Constitutional data, what’s that?
How is it not opinion (are you aware that what your constitutional expert wrote is actually called a legal opinion) to conclude that overturning one ruling which was based on certain inferences will automatically keep those inferences from ever being used again in more reasonable applications?
You are punching well above your weight, making these proclamations. You are, as has been pointed out repeatedly by several others, swallowing the liberal doctrine without critical thinking.
__________________
 Scott, Portland, OR '85 V-20 I/O, Merc 170
|