[scook]

Zero chance of success means rather a lot when YOU have repeatedly billed the event as the greatest threat to our democracy since the civil war. Since it was no threat at all, your calling it that is indeed incompetent blather.

“Fight like hell”, the phrase used repeatedly by probably every politician alive, is a call to violence, ONLY when used by Trump? “Trial by combat”, have you never heard of analogies, good grief?

Uttering the words “so called left” demonstrates your ignorance (or complicity) with respect to the endless violence, very much encouraged and permissioned by the left. Members of congress were even setting up funds to bail the violent thugs out and referring to federal officers who were dispatched to protect federal property, e.g. courthouses, that local far left politicians wouldn’t ALLOW local police to protect, as attacking the citizens. Any time a person of color is killed by a police officer, no matter what the facts of the situation, it’s murder and there are riots. Some of the killings are very wrong and some are very justified. The wrong ones are illegal and should be honestly prosecuted. As ONE example, the officer who shot the girl who had a knife poised to murder another girl was immediately and ignorantly labeled by Biden, his VP and other prominent far left politicians as a white supremicist murderer - Biden’s agenda of falsely vilifying honest officers for his political gain not part of the problem? Yes, you are willfully ignorant and blind to the massive threat of the left dividing Americans against each other and very much encouraging LOTS of violence.

Honest people have different views, but in my lifetime, I have seen absolutely huge improvements in race relations and equalizing of opportunity and fair treatment/protection of everyone. We certainly haven’t arrived at anything like perfection, but the divisive (turning Americans against each other) that the left is currently pushing HARD seems to me to be reversing and wasting the progress that has been painfully made since MLK and a lot of very brave people did their work.

Back to the accounting firm - they were certainly providing “audited” financial statements. While that may be outside your area of understanding, it’s not outside of mine - it was their RESPONSIBILITY to verify the data. If it’s fraudulent, they are likely on the hook criminally. Of course you’re not surprised - you don’t understand the area in question (really don’t understand it) and view everything through your extreme confirmation bias. Gee whiz, not surprised.