View Single Post
  #22  
Unread 08-18-2017, 09:45 AM
bigshrimpin bigshrimpin is offline
God
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,597
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Destroyer View Post
Looking at the pics of the Seablade I have to say truthfully that I'm not in the least impressed. First, it's an ugly boat. Second, it's a 35' boat. That's NOT in the same class as a 20 or a 21 or a 23 or even a 25. Third, it's powered by two (2) 300 hp engines. Good for ppl that can afford that kind of power, but realistically it's way outta the league of most of the people that are driving 20-25's. As far as the hull itself goes, whoopti-do, it can hit 60. Hell with twin 300's I can strap them on just about any 20-25 that can hold them and hit that speed with ease. Then there's the mention in the article about how the boat is really 3 hulls... a main hull and 2 side hulls called Amas'. The article goes on to state that " The stabilized monohull design has a slender center hull with two stabilizing amas, which form entrapment tunnels between the main hull and amas." I wonder if they ever looked at the Wellcraft Airslot which did almost exactly the same thing. (Except they called the outside hulls "Sponsons"). I can tell you from recent experience with my little 16.5 Airslot that it's remarkably stable at speeds and I can handle chops and snot a lot larger than anything I ever could in some of my previous boats of that size. Granted, it's never going to be able to handle 4' chop, but then again, it's only 16.5 feet long verses the 35 foot length for the Seablade.
Now, to get back to the title of this thread which is "What would make a V better" ....... Certainly making it into a 35 footer and adding twin 300 hp engines would make it a better boat... but then again, it would also make it into something other than a V20/21. So lets start being realistic about what would make a V a better boat. Some of the answers, like getting rid of the wood, taller cuddy, etc are pretty good. Lets all try to stay on subject and not go off on wild a$$ daydreams, shall we?
Quote:
Originally Posted by bgreene View Post
Exactly........

Use google ;) How lazy and judgemental can you possibly be? You can't even type in http://sea-blade.com/ to see there are 16 - 40 versions. no one ever said function and performance were good looking (evinrude g2). It's time to close your mouth and open your minds. The hull might resemble an airslot, but all that means is that dick cole was onto something :) Just b/c they look the same to you, does not mean they are remotely similar.

BG - Take note of Destroyers comments and understand that people buy boats on their looks (what looks good to them . . . shiny gelcoat, traditional shape and style) and NOT their performance. People are lazy by nature, so if there's a HUGE education component to selling, the masses aren't going to be swayed (just cause one boats ride is marginally better than another). The marketing expense to educate buyers is going to bankrupt the unicorn boat company.




Here is Kama II which is just one of the experimental 25 Seacrafts.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ln3Y1A_RNCM
__________________
1971 222 Hiliner
1973 23 Seacraft Center Console
1973 23 Seacraft Sceptre
1971 25 Seacraft Seafari
1972 28 Cary

Last edited by bigshrimpin; 08-18-2017 at 01:12 PM.
Reply With Quote