Quote:
Originally Posted by reelapeelin
Yer right CT...the kids lose, we ALL lose...it's LABELED Socialist...funny cuz there are a lotta folks on the right allowed it to happen and have sat by for many years and let it go...  |
yes both sides are guilty. I was always curious as to why sterilization is not part of govt free health care. for example let's say this woman didn't won't more than 5 kids because the government had a 5 child cap on benefits received. In example, if you have more than 5 kids you do not get more benefits. There would be 2 motives to get the surgery. 1. The Government will not support more than 5 kids thus meaning I shouldn't have more kids. 2. hey free surgery not to have more kids that I will not receive aid for. The cap could be whatever you want. that's not the point I am debating. For example lets say that the surgery was $5000 to the tax payer. You would figure that between the medicaid and the WIC (free baby food) and the cost of delivery to the baby. that surgery would make sense financially to the Government.
This is would be completely voluntary to all those that qualify and would be better for the Mother and all the children. I thought it was a universal issue that parents want better lives for their children. I don't seen how this would disagree with that argument. Can someone play devil's advocate to my idea?