![]() |
"Land and Sea" Dyno Results from the 80'
|
Re: "Land and Sea" Dyno Results from the
Bigshrimpin:
Intersting post. Thought older motors were rated on powerhed HP vice prop shaft HP as newer ones are, so is this chart saying something different? Thought Land & sea only made prop shaft dynos Quick check on google indiactes a 160 CI 235 is = 2.62193024 liters. Kamikaze |
Re: "Land and Sea" Dyno Results from the
Me too . . . There's no way Merc would be advertising their 200hp (78-81) to be rated @ 195hp . . . so I imagine that these are Land and Seas Dyno test @ the prop shaft. That why I thought it was worth posting.
|
Re: "Land and Sea" Dyno Results from the
Bigshrimpin:
Don't want to highjack the thread but I have a 1994 Mercury 2.0L question for you. I'll PM you if that's okay? Kamikaze |
Re: "Land and Sea" Dyno Results from the
I'll try to answer it . . . You can post it here if you want.
|
Re: "Land and Sea" Dyno Results from the
I have questions also, but I never get a call back?? :'(
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:16 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.