Trump continuing to make trouble
 

So now Trumps suing social media - Twitter , Facebook etc for cutting him off.
Another nonsensical frivolous law suit to gain attention while he knows its ridiculous.

Our decency laws allow private entities to ban users per the 230 Communications Decency Act that helps protect against tyrants and dictator wanna bees like trump .
Without this protection Trump could have the power to ban any media that disagrees with him in any way

Trump however knows some of his followers DONT THINK and follow him with starry eyed ignorance
https://techcrunch.com/2021/07/07/tr...rst-amendment/

:haha: :you:

This is, without a doubt, your silliest post to date. (And there have been many) (most) (all in fact) Here you are talking about President Trump like he wants to be a dictator or something when in FACT, HE was the one that was censored by a group of tyrants that want to be our rulers/dictators. Censoring is the second act that ANY dictator does. (The first, of course, being taking control of [most] of the media). Now lets see...... What group of people do we know that are doing that very thing, right now, with the wholehearted support of their ignorant followers?? Hmmm......could it be SATAN?? (With apologies to SNL) Oh, I know, it's the Democrats.:cen:

Censorship of many types is only fun for those who are achieving the gag orders

If Trump could sensor social media that did not agree with him — he would.
And then we’d be China, North Korea, Russia , Iran.

If Trump could get away with his election lie — he would.

Suggest you stick with the repair forum destroyer — I believe you’re good at that.

Our Communications Decency Rules protects the rights of social media sources from censorship by our government .

This is EXACTLY WHY Trumps new frivolous law suits will go nowhere - and he knows it.
He just craves the attention and adoration from those ignorant to our laws


Even Trump friend Supreme Court member Brett Kavanaugh has vocally agreed with this rule - look it up.

FACTS matter

Thank you for the complement about the repair section.

But you are making assumptions about what President Trump would or would not do with regard to censorship. You have no real proof of your assertions
Certainly if he was going to do something like that he would have done it when he was president.

Meanwhile you are blithely overlooking the very real censorship that the Democrats and their media cronies are doing right now. How can you possibly say that it's wrong with regard to President Trump but agree with it with regard to the Democrats practicing it? It makes no sense.

Proof is simple Trump is suing these companies for cutting him off.

This will likely go nowhere in court because our laws are clear .

But you are ignoring my point. How can you condone censorship for one but not for another?

Destroyer there is no but, but, but in this case or what I condone or not.

Read the FACTS as it applies to our CONSTITUTIONAL LAWS regarding limiting government censorship. Trump has no right to force private social media from banning him - which they did after the assault on our Capitol.


https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...er/7886696002/

And YOU are STILL ignoring my question. I'm NOT asking what did President Trump do or not do. I'm just asking YOU, How can YOU condone censoring one person or group of persons but not apply the same rules to a different person or group of people?

Destroyer its easy to ignore your questions because youve demonstrated yourself nasty and vulgar .

But YES I can and do support limits on so called free speech. In fact our democracy limits free speech when its being used to incite harm against others and or incite violence as Trump did.

READ AND LEARN

https://theconversation.com/no-twitt...-others-153092