| Destroyer |
05-16-2012 10:32 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Destroyer
(Post 189066)
Truthfully, I don't know if he's right or wrong.
We all know that in the view of the medical/industrial complex, people that go against "accepted" medical views are looked at as heritics and periahs that must be persecuted.
So really I just don't know if this is simply that or if there's something to be said for the rejection. But either way, at least there's a conflicting point of view to consider. :head:
|
I hope you guys didn't misuinderstand me. Like I said, I really don't know. I'm not a doctor, and I don't have training in that field. Nor was i trying to champion one side or the other. I was just trying to point out to everyone that there is, indeed, a conflicting point of view. I tend to be a conspiricy theorist type of person. I suspect everyone, especially the large drug companies, of ulterior motives in cases like this.
Hell, I really believe that the cure for some types of cancers has been discovered many times, and that it's been hushed up simply because people make money off of "treating" the symptoms of cancer, but not the illness itself. (1/3 of ALL the money spent on illnesses in the US is spent on cancer treatments....from the doctors to the drugs to the machines to the hospitals to the funeral houses, including all the makers of needles, tubing, etc etc etc etc etc....) So you don't have to convince me that it's very possible for this doctor to have had his license yanked for simply telling the truth. They tend to steamrollor over anyone that goes against the mainstream thinking in the medical field.
|