![]() |
Storm the Castle girls?
DC Police report a car crashing the gates of the White House, victim shot by secret service on capital hill. A FEMALE!
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
It's sad they killed her. I mean.... really?
Not making any excuses for her, she did injure 2 cops with her car. But why kill her? I've seen lots of videos on TV of cop chases and they do a pit maneuver and take the person into custody. Just sad. She did not have a gun or a weapon of any kind other than her car. The police could have easily shot out her tires. She had a mental illness, she suffered from delusions and had a 1 year old child in the car with her for Gods sake.. WHY kill her? What were they trying to do, make an example of her? Disgusting. |
I think the reason they killed her is because they didn't know it wasn't a suicide bomber with a trunk full of explosives. They may have not even known it was a woman?
|
Quote:
Again, as I said in the beginning, I'm not making any excuses for her behavior. I just think the cops way over reacted on this one. She didn't have to die. |
I fall somewhere in between. It is a shame that an apparently mentally ill woman was killed. However what kind of indication should a cop look for that someone is meaning to do harm? Running a car up to a barricade at a White House security checkpoint is a pretty good indication to me.....they all dont have to be yelling alla akbar as they do themselves in.
And as far as being a woman, if it was a black man it would be open season and more justified? The original cops that had her stopped showed good restraint. One was looking right into her window at her and could have ended right there. unfortunately when she ran she took her own life. Sad, but thats the way it is. |
I'm no fan of just shooting away at people, but in this case there are too many unknown factors. And considering the shooting at the Navy Yard, I don't think they had any other choice. Sad but true
|
I agree with a lot of the sentiments here, messed up situation.
I wonder how the story would be spun if it were a middle age white male wearing camo and driving a 20 year old pick up truck? |
Very sad. I didn't have any details when I started this thread. Tragic.
|
just because she was trying to run them down isn't a good enough excuse to shoo........ oh wait. yes it is. now her family is complaining that they shouldn't have shot her with a baby in the car. those dam police put her baby in the car.
they should go shoot the rest of her idiot family now. |
Quote:
There are several people here that have said that considering the shooting at the Naval Yard a week earlier it's understandable why the police shot at her, and I tend to agree with them, but I've also always thought that each incident was supposed to be judged on it's own merits by the police. Apparently, they didn't do that in this case. Again, please understand, as I've been saying all along, I'm NOT making any excuses for the dead woman. What she did was wrong, dangerous and she injured 2 police officers. (And obviously signed her own death warrant in the process, cause you can't injure policemen and be allowed to live). I just think that the police used excessive force when they subdued her. I really think they could have done a better job. Hopefully, this incident will serve as some type of training program for police so they can better hone their situational awareness skills. |
the next question..... if they hadn't shot her and she had escaped long enough to crash into a schoolyard of kids killing several including her own baby would the officers then be criticized for not killing her when they had the chance?
|
Quote:
The police are not allowed to theorize on what might happen in the future, only on what has happened already. She might just as easily have driven home, parked her car in her driveway, taken her meds, gone to bed and not remembered a thing about the entire incident the next day. Who's to say differently? |
of course it's a hypothetical question.... I don't think I presented it any other way???
I really don't know what happened but as best as I can understand it she was trying to forcibly escape by ramming her car through police officers.... IF THAT IS THE CASE then deadly force is authorized by our current laws and they would have killed me or you or anyone else..... an automobile IS a deadly weapon. male or female makes no difference here.... none at all. the fact that she has mental problems doesn't give her a pass but does make it a tragic event that SHOULD have been avoidable.... One COULD argue that anyone who entered into a battle with the police had mental problems. Who knows, maybe the first secret service man could have stopped the situation by telling her he would take her to the president and removing her from the car and detaining her right there and then. |
Let me add that IF she was disarmed by the car being disabled then I fully agree that she should have been arrested but my understanding is that she was still moving the vehicle when shot
|
Quote:
Good to have respect for the law and all, but really? I wonder too about how she was able to ram the gates and not do any damage to the front of her car. Must have utilized a "soft ramming". |
Quote:
She backed up, then went forward on an angle, backed up again, turned the wheels and went forward again.. got out of the box she was in and sped off with a police car chasing her. Went around a circle where a second police car joined the first in the pursuit, and then sped off down the street. At no time up till then had the police opened fire at her. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:26 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.