Wellcraft V20 Community

Wellcraft V20 Community (https://forums.wmpdevserver1.com/community/index.php)
-   Political Forum (https://forums.wmpdevserver1.com/community/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Kamala’s policy’s? (https://forums.wmpdevserver1.com/community/showthread.php?t=24076)

Pipe_Dream 09-04-2024 06:55 AM

America under the Biden/Harris administration:

Across New York, recently arrived migrants are flooding the criminal justice system — at far higher rates than public officials have acknowledged.

Police sources shared with The Post a staggering estimate that as many as 75% of the people they’ve been arresting in Midtown Manhattan in recent months for crimes like assault, robbery and domestic violence are migrants. In parts of Queens, the figure is more than 60%, sources there estimate.


https://nypost.com/2024/09/02/us-new...handcuff-cops/

An illegal alien from Mexico, deported 16 times from the United States, has been sentenced to just one year in prison for causing a crash that killed 64-year-old Scott Miller in Conifer, Colorado.

In June, 47-year-old Ignacio Cruz-Mendoza was arrested for vehicular homicide concerning the crash that killed Miller but the Jefferson County District Attorney’s Office filed only misdemeanor traffic violation charges against the illegal alien.



https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2...-colorado-man/

Pipe_Dream 09-04-2024 07:09 AM

A 17-year-old Norteno gang member from Tracy, CA was caught with a gun and subsequently released. Three days later he shot 49ers' player Ricky Pearsall.

Under the Biden/Harris administration's immigration policies events such as this are becoming the norm. But Harris promises to secure the border AFTER she is elected.

bgreene 09-04-2024 07:47 AM

Republicans blocked Bidens even tougher border policy —- because it made them look bad

Pipe_Dream 09-04-2024 07:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bgreene (Post 254524)
Republicans blocked Bidens even tougher border policy —- because it made them look bad

"tougher"

:you:

The policy that simply put more processing agents on the border in order to get immigrants into the federal system faster?

Pipe_Dream 09-04-2024 07:59 AM

Kamala, "when I am elected..."


https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GWnPJTZX...png&name=small

Blue_Runner 09-04-2024 08:37 AM

I think she wants the border wall now to keep all those millions IN.

Pipe_Dream 09-04-2024 10:45 AM

Wasn't someone pointing out that some of the Kennedy family were against his alignment with Trump as if it was a big deal?

Well, don't look now but Tim Walz's family has a message for him . . .

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GWos5VKW...jpg&name=small

oteps 09-04-2024 03:12 PM

Still nothing on her website about policies. Back and forth on everything. Lots of stuff opposite now compared to when she lost the primary. Wonder why?

bgreene 09-04-2024 03:19 PM

You’ve got nothing but misinformation and trumps lies .

oteps 09-04-2024 04:12 PM

Yes you are correct. Nothing on her site about policies and she is full of misinformation.

Destroyer 09-04-2024 05:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bgreene (Post 254524)
Republicans blocked Bidens even tougher border policy —- because it made them look bad

The bill would have allowed 5000 illegals into our country PER DAY! DO THE MATH! That's 1,825,000 MILLION Illegals into our country every year. (And that's not counting any illegals or got-a-ways that will also enter,)
Exactly HOW is that tougher? Republicans blocked the bill BECAUSE IT WAS BAD!! HOW can you be so blind???


.

bgreene 09-04-2024 07:17 PM

Oh stop with your heritage foundation nonsense

oteps 09-04-2024 07:39 PM

Well what are her policies?

bgreene 09-04-2024 08:56 PM

Kamala’s policies ?
Well they include;

1. Not lying about upcoming election results
2. Not encouraging a violent insurrection attempt
3. Not keeping our top secret documents in bathrooms and lying they weren’t there
4. Not kissing up to Putin like he’s got something on her
5. Not planning to gut our Constitution and try to become authoritarian leader

I could go on but these polices certainly differ sharply from trumps

oteps 09-04-2024 09:04 PM

And you found these policies where. I would like to fact check them and can't find them.
Once again more bs

Giorgio 09-05-2024 05:45 AM

1 Attachment(s)
The DCP (democratic communist party)=

bgreene 09-05-2024 12:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Giorgio (Post 254575)
The DCP (democratic communist party)=

Must you guys just repeat whatever Trump tells you to ?
Nonsense

steplift20 09-06-2024 08:11 AM

Forget about trying to educate Bgreene. He has a very serious case of TDS. It’s incurable for some people. And he is one of them.
Leave him alone and join me on the Trump train coming to a city near you. I hear it coming. The. Trump. Train. It’s coming. And not soon enough
Trump 2024. M. A. G. A.
I hear the train a coming
It’s coming around the bend
And I ain’t seen the sunshine ,since I don’t know when
I been to Biden prison

RWilson2526 09-06-2024 10:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Destroyer (Post 254553)
The bill would have allowed 5000 illegals into our country PER DAY! DO THE MATH! That's 1,825,000 MILLION Illegals into our country every year. (And that's not counting any illegals or got-a-ways that will also enter,)
Exactly HOW is that tougher? Republicans blocked the bill BECAUSE IT WAS BAD!! HOW can you be so blind???


.


Does Not ‘Accept’ 5,000 Illegal Immigrants a Day

Leading up to the vote, House Majority Leader Steve Scalise on social media said the bill “accepts 5,000 illegal immigrants a day.” Republican Sen. Marsha Blackburn added her voice to the opposition, posting that she would “never vote to make illegal immigration legal.”

Those comments misrepresented the bill.

The bill stated that temporary border emergency authority would be automatically activated by the Department of Homeland Security secretary if there is an average of 5,000 or more migrant encounters a day over seven consecutive days — or if there are 8,500 or more such encounters on any single day. In December — according to the latest data from U.S. Customs and Border Protection — there was an average of more than 8,000 encounters a day of migrants who crossed the border illegally between points of entry.

“It’s not that the first 5,000 [migrants encountered at the border] are released, that’s ridiculous,” Lankford said on the Senate floor. “The first 5,000 we detain, we screen and then we deport. If we get above 5,000, we just detain and deport.”

In a social media post on Feb. 5, Trump wrote, “Only a fool, or a Radical Left Democrat, would vote for this horrendous Border Bill, which only gives Shutdown Authority after 5000 Encounters a day.”

He’s wrong about the 5,000 encounters threshold. Although that is the threshold for mandatory activation of the emergency authority, the bill also would have extended “discretionary activation” to the Homeland Security secretary once there is an average of 4,000 or more encounters over seven consecutive days. Customs and Border Protection provides only monthly data, and looking at data during the Trump administration the number of encounters would have reached that threshold in May 2019, when encounters averaged 4,286 per day.

“The reason we’re doing that [providing emergency authority] is because we want to be able to shut down the system when it gets overloaded, so we have enough time to process those asylum claims,” Sen. Kyrsten Sinema, who helped craft the bill, said on CBS’ “Face the Nation” on Feb. 4.

“So we have placed provisions in the law that mandate the enforcement of each of these provisions of our law and require the Biden administration and any future administration to actually implement this,” Sinema, an independent who caucuses with the Democrats, said. “So, we’re requiring it, not permitting it.”

In other words, while President Joe Biden had said that if the bill passed he would have exercised that emergency authority immediately, it would not have been a choice at this time — it would have been mandatory.

As for claims that the bill would allow or accept 5,000 illegal crossings a day, that’s a distortion of what’s in the bill.

“That authority would be mandated when arrivals exceed an average over the previous seven days of 5,000,” Theresa Cardinal Brown, a senior adviser on immigration and border policy at the Bipartisan Policy Center, told us via email. “This is not a number that is ‘allowed in.’ It is a threshold of ARRIVALS that triggers a new authority.”

“We already have more than 5,000 illegal crossings happening,” Brown said. “We aren’t ‘allowing it’; it is happening, and we then have to deal with it.”

“There is this idea that we control how many migrants attempt illegal crossings. We do not. The migrants (and smugglers) control that,” Brown said. “We control what happens once we encounter someone who has already crossed the border illegally.”

Pipe_Dream 09-06-2024 10:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oteps (Post 254571)
Well what are her policies?

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GWylyLbX...png&name=small

Who knows??:oh:

Destroyer 09-06-2024 02:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RWilson2526 (Post 254589)
Does Not ‘Accept’ 5,000 Illegal Immigrants a Day

Leading up to the vote, House Majority Leader Steve Scalise on social media said the bill “accepts 5,000 illegal immigrants a day.” Republican Sen. Marsha Blackburn added her voice to the opposition, posting that she would “never vote to make illegal immigration legal.”

Those comments misrepresented the bill.

The bill stated that temporary border emergency authority would be automatically activated by the Department of Homeland Security secretary if there is an average of 5,000 or more migrant encounters a day over seven consecutive days — or if there are 8,500 or more such encounters on any single day. In December — according to the latest data from U.S. Customs and Border Protection — there was an average of more than 8,000 encounters a day of migrants who crossed the border illegally between points of entry.

“It’s not that the first 5,000 [migrants encountered at the border] are released, that’s ridiculous,” Lankford said on the Senate floor. “The first 5,000 we detain, we screen and then we deport. If we get above 5,000, we just detain and deport.”

In a social media post on Feb. 5, Trump wrote, “Only a fool, or a Radical Left Democrat, would vote for this horrendous Border Bill, which only gives Shutdown Authority after 5000 Encounters a day.”

He’s wrong about the 5,000 encounters threshold. Although that is the threshold for mandatory activation of the emergency authority, the bill also would have extended “discretionary activation” to the Homeland Security secretary once there is an average of 4,000 or more encounters over seven consecutive days. Customs and Border Protection provides only monthly data, and looking at data during the Trump administration the number of encounters would have reached that threshold in May 2019, when encounters averaged 4,286 per day.

“The reason we’re doing that [providing emergency authority] is because we want to be able to shut down the system when it gets overloaded, so we have enough time to process those asylum claims,” Sen. Kyrsten Sinema, who helped craft the bill, said on CBS’ “Face the Nation” on Feb. 4.

“So we have placed provisions in the law that mandate the enforcement of each of these provisions of our law and require the Biden administration and any future administration to actually implement this,” Sinema, an independent who caucuses with the Democrats, said. “So, we’re requiring it, not permitting it.”

In other words, while President Joe Biden had said that if the bill passed he would have exercised that emergency authority immediately, it would not have been a choice at this time — it would have been mandatory.

As for claims that the bill would allow or accept 5,000 illegal crossings a day, that’s a distortion of what’s in the bill.

“That authority would be mandated when arrivals exceed an average over the previous seven days of 5,000,” Theresa Cardinal Brown, a senior adviser on immigration and border policy at the Bipartisan Policy Center, told us via email. “This is not a number that is ‘allowed in.’ It is a threshold of ARRIVALS that triggers a new authority.”

“We already have more than 5,000 illegal crossings happening,” Brown said. “We aren’t ‘allowing it’; it is happening, and we then have to deal with it.”

“There is this idea that we control how many migrants attempt illegal crossings. We do not. The migrants (and smugglers) control that,” Brown said. “We control what happens once we encounter someone who has already crossed the border illegally.”


So exactly HOW was it a good bill then? It doesn't STOP people from coming in. It only gives "Authority" to shut the border. The same border that Biden has allowed to be open and FLOOD our Country with over 20 MILLION illegals in the last 3 3/4 years. It's a piece of fluff designed to look good while actually doing nothing!

.

bgreene 09-06-2024 05:48 PM

WRONG as usual destroyer

Destroyer 09-07-2024 08:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bgreene (Post 254611)
WRONG as usual destroyer

WRONG as usual bgreene

.

oteps 09-08-2024 06:16 PM

Still waiting. What are her policies? How am I supposed to know who to vote against?

Pipe_Dream 09-09-2024 10:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oteps (Post 254664)
Still waiting. What are her policies? How am I supposed to know who to vote against?

This should help.

https://twitter.com/i/status/1832771369072775337


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:16 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.