Wellcraft V20 Community

Wellcraft V20 Community (https://forums.wmpdevserver1.com/community/index.php)
-   Political Forum (https://forums.wmpdevserver1.com/community/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Mike Pence now speaks up against trump (https://forums.wmpdevserver1.com/community/showthread.php?t=23523)

bgreene 02-11-2022 04:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scook (Post 247001)
Talk about desperate - you have to claim Trump was lying when he said he’d be too busy for much golf and found he could work and get in more golf than anticipated - you actually call that a lie? That’s one of your most infantile assertions.

You’re WRONG AGAIN scook - I’m just stating the FACTS of what trump said and did.
Trump said he wouldn’t have time to play golf as President but he actually played more golf than the man he said should not have.

YOU MAKE EXCUSE SCOOK “ oh but he worked on the golf course…..
There’s no “ but “ here just the FACTS that you deny

scook 02-11-2022 09:54 AM

If you think that is important, you shouldn’t be without adult supervision. It’s a lie, instead of simply finding out something different?

Can you grasp the difference between an important fact and a completely irrelevant one?

bgreene 02-11-2022 12:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scook (Post 247015)
If you think that is important, you shouldn’t be without adult supervision. It’s a lie, instead of simply finding out something different?

Can you grasp the difference between an important fact and a completely irrelevant one?

Yeh, yeh you just call all the news and facts you don’t like lies …..
Listen you control freak - I’ll write about the facts and if you can just keep whining

scook 02-13-2022 01:04 AM

Your disrespectful, completely off topic, completely inaccurate, non-responses are drivel and make you look really foolish. Any reasonable person reading my post and your response would discount anything you say as the blathering of an incompetent.

bgreene 02-17-2022 11:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scook (Post 247081)
Your disrespectful, completely off topic, completely inaccurate, non-responses are drivel and make you look really foolish. Any reasonable person reading my post and your response would discount anything you say as the blathering of an incompetent.

…” blathering of an incompetent “ cries scookie ! Haha keep crying

FACT is Pence is correct - he had no right to stop the rightfully elected transfer of power to Biden. So Pence said NO to trumps lie .

Destroyer 02-19-2022 01:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bgreene (Post 247168)
…” blathering of an incompetent “ cries scookie ! Haha keep crying

FACT is Pence is correct - he had no right to stop the rightfully elected transfer of power to Biden. So Pence said NO to trumps lie .

As I've said many times, everyone, even you Greene, is entitled to their opinion. That doesn't make them those opinions right or wrong. (WELL, IN YOUR CASE ALMOST ALWAYS WRONG) But I digress. Mr. Pence is entitled to his opinion. I've seen lengthy articles written by lawyers on both sides of the aisle saying that he did and that he did not have the power.

Are you a lawyer schooled in congressional law Greene? Because if you are not may I respectfully suggest that you shut up because you don't know what you're talking about and are only making (continuing) a fool of yourself.

.

bgreene 02-19-2022 02:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Destroyer (Post 247202)
As I've said many times, everyone, even you Greene, is entitled to their opinion. That doesn't make them those opinions right or wrong. (WELL, IN YOUR CASE ALMOST ALWAYS WRONG) But I digress. Mr. Pence is entitled to his opinion. I've seen lengthy articles written by lawyers on both sides of the aisle saying that he did and that he did not have the power.

Are you a lawyer schooled in congressional law Greene? Because if you are not may I respectfully suggest that you shut up because you don't know what you're talking about and are only making (continuing) a fool of yourself.

.

Destroyer …more BS from you as usual . Don’t have to be a lawyer to FACT CHECK.
And it’s not an opinion it’s OUR CONSTITUTIONAL FACT that Pence had no power over election determination . You’re wrong again .

https://apnews.com/article/fact-checking-275776015398

scook 02-19-2022 05:47 AM

I’m sure you’re right bgreene - we should definitely view the AP as purveyors of “OUR CONSTITUTIONAL FACT”, a phrase that you appear to have just made up, over the ACTUAL fact that lawyers, who study these issues, don’t agree on the law.

You have no idea of what is and isn’t a FACT, but in your naive ignorance and arrogance, you’re not dissuaded from proclaiming huge amounts of BS as FACTS.

If anyone, not already as deluded as yourself, found your nonsense persuasive, you would be dangerous. Thankfully they don’t and you’re not.

bgreene 02-19-2022 07:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scook (Post 247218)
I***8217;m sure you***8217;re right bgreene - we should definitely view the AP as purveyors of ***8220;OUR CONSTITUTIONAL FACT***8221;, a phrase that you appear to have just made up, over the ACTUAL fact that lawyers, who study these issues, don***8217;t agree on the law.

You have no idea of what is and isn***8217;t a FACT, but in your naive ignorance and arrogance, you***8217;re not dissuaded from proclaiming huge amounts of BS as FACTS.

If anyone, not already as deluded as yourself, found your nonsense persuasive, you would be dangerous. Thankfully they don***8217;t and you***8217;re not.

WRONG AGAIN SCOOK as I correctly posted, while trump lawyers argue over select areas of the law, the FACT is Pence had NO CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY over voting result process .

bgreene 02-19-2022 08:00 AM

Pence had NO POWER to stop the legal process.
As Pence stated - TRUMP WASWRONG

Michael McConell, law professor and director of the Constitutional Law Center at Stanford Law School, said there are some ambiguities within the Electoral Count Act that could be shored up. For example, there is some ambiguity in the language referring to how Congress handles competing slates of electors from a state when the law says only those that are “regularly given” shall be counted, he said.

And HERE IT IS :
But NONE of the ambiguities could be reasonably interpreted as giving the vice president the power to unilaterally overturn an election’s results, said McConell, a former federal appellate judge. He said there was no serious basis for that claim.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:42 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.