I agree that the states, where this issue is legally dealt with, should make reasonable provision for the physical health of the mother, and in cases of rape and incest, while remembering that a life is still being taken.

It’s despicable and abominable to be murdering human babies for convenience, after a woman DOESN’T exercise control over her body. It would be a productive effort to make adoption a reasonable thing for regular, non-wealthy people to do - there’s a big demand that’s not being accommodated, very much to the detriment of the babies and would be parents.

It’s pretty obvious that supporting adoption in a meaningful way is something that would undermine the left’s doctrine of unlimited abortion - they seem to think it’s better to spend their time attacking an adoption support organization and illegally harassing and threatening Supreme Court justices.

:cry:

Notice that you blame the WOMAN in your post.
Also notice that you don’t come out AGAINST inclusion of rape and incest in abortion laws, you instead call it “ reasonable provisions “ ….
Word games from scook.

I’m PRO CHOICE . No jargon, no word games .

If you see word games anywhere in my post, there's something wrong with you.

I'm pro-life, with reasonable safeguards. You're pro murder of babies - no jargon or word games, I'll give you that. I find your cavalier attitude toward killing babies to be troubling and despicable.

As for blaming the woman, if a woman is concerned about having choice about her body, a good choice would be to not have unwanted babies. Birth control is cheap and available, and actually exercising control over what is done with and to her body is a very good practice to avoid becoming pregnant.

There are honest people arguing both sides of the issue, but wholesale killing of human beings isn't an ethical way of dealing with what is almost always irresponsible behavior.

“ cavalier attitude “ says scook.

You’re wrong as usual - I’m pro choice , nothing “ cavalier “ about it .
Just my position…….which is also the majorities position.

Certainly cavalier about human life, and I don’t think the majority supports your extreme lack of concern about murdering babies.

Abortion is just another nice word for murder. 53,000,000 babies have been murdered since Roe was adopted. It's been estimated that 70,000,000 million people died in WWII. So we are on track to murder more people (babies ARE people) than died in WWII... Anyone that feels pride in that is sick and should burn in hell..

Here's an interesting tid-bit of information. According to Planned Parenthood, 438 out of every 1000 abortions are African American. Just a little less than 50%. Yet African American's only account for 18% or the population. Perhaps if there was more responsibility taken that statistic might be more in line with national percentages. I mean, why use protection if you can just go and have an abortion whenever you want. Just sayin'

.

Approx 600,000 abortions per year. Who’s to adopt all those unwanted babies ?
Who’s going to pay the welfare ?
Life begins at conception ? A mass of cells with potential to form a human isn’t quite murdering babies .

A mass of cells? Pretty well organized mass, given that barring a significant anomaly, ALWAYS turn into what you recognize as a human person.

You must have missed my post about the horrible adoption process - lots of normal, non-wealthy families want to adopt but it’s an impossibly difficult, heartbreaking and expensive process. Maybe work on that problem, as I have previously suggested and you are as usual pretending not to have heard, instead of murdering innocent children.

Oh now it’s “ murdering children “ ……a mass of cells.
Roe-Wade CONSTITUTIONAL FEDERAL LAW until trumps court appointees go against the Will of the majority of Americans .