PDA

View Full Version : Fisherman hope to tip scales?


macojoe
12-13-2006, 04:02 PM
December 13, 2006

Fishermen hope to tip scales

By DOUG FRASER
STAFF WRITER
Cape Cod fishermen don't mince words about the cod, haddock and flounder regulations that have whittled fishing days down to 30 a year with little improvement in depleted fish populations.

'Everybody in this business is just disgusted with the way it's being managed,'' Chatham cod fisherman John Our said this week.

Attempting to get fishery management back on the right track, Congress last weekend passed its first major revision of the Magnuson-Stevens Act in a decade.

The act sets national standards that govern the country's regional fishery management councils and the National Marine Fisheries Service, which in turn write regulations to protect and rebuild the nation's fish stocks.

Reacting to pressure from environmentalists and fishermen, Congress essentially decided it was time to try something new. The revised Magnuson-Stevens Act strengthens the role of scientists in setting annual fish catch quotas and mandates the fisheries service to end overfishing immediately. It also advocates new management techniques intended to give fishermen a greater voice.

For the past decade or more, New England has cutback fishing days, limited daily catches and mandated gear changes that make it more difficult for fishermen to catch fish.

But with more than 1,000 fishermen chasing cod and other bottom-feeding species, those regulations proved too inexact. Chronic overfishing, and the wasteful discarding of fish that exceeded daily quotas, kept New England fish stocks from recovering. This, in turn, resulted in even harsher regulations.

In revising the Magnuson-Stevens Act, Congress, led by Sen. Ted Stevens, R-Alaska, went to the North Pacific playbook and enacted rules that give fishermen shares in the annual fish quota and allow them to manage a fishery like an employee-owned business.

Alaskan halibut fishermen, for instance, each have a percentage of a quota, based on what they historically caught before the quota system was instituted. Fishermen report daily landings electronically to keep from exceeding the annual allowable catch. It's in their own best interest to keep the halibut population robust. The more fish there are, the more each fisherman can catch.

Innovative Cape fishermen saw the merits in self-management years ago. For the past 18 months, 58 Cape hook fishermen - who catch fish with long lines of thousands of baited hooks - have controlled a 12.8 percent share of the annual Georges Bank cod quota. Following their lead, Cape gill-net fishermen received approval from the fisheries service last month to manage another 20 percent of the Georges Bank cod quota.

John Our is one of those 12 gill-net fishermen. Gill nets are rectangular panels of netting that stand vertically in the water, tethered between anchors and surface buoys. Fish swim into these nets and get entangled around their gills.

On a recent fishing trip, Our put out three sets of nets, catching his daily cod limit of 1,000 pounds by the time he'd hauled in the first two sets of nets. The third string of nets was loaded down with an additional thousand pounds.

Current regulations required Our to throw the additional thousand pounds of fish back into the water, even though they were dead. The discarded fish would have earned him thousands of more dollars for that fishing day.

Under the new gill-net management plan, Our said, he could keep any daily catch, as long as he didn't go over his annual portion of the quota. When he did reach that amount, Our would tie up his boat for the year.

Scientists aren't sure how much catch fishermen are throwing back to avoid going over their daily limits, but it is believed to be a big factor in the failure to rebuild some species such as cod. Our believes the new plan not only ends wasteful discarding, but also allows fishermen to catch the quota in less time, using less fuel, with less impact on fish stocks.

The plan reserves a portion of the 12 Cape Cod gill-net fishermen's overall quota as a buffer in case anyone does go over. An additional amount is reserved in case the group catches any cod while they are pursuing other species, such as monkfish.

With some scientists predicting the virtual extinction of commercially fished species within 40 or 50 years, federal managers are not just going to rely on fishermen to be honest.

This year, all groundfish vessels were required to install satellite monitoring devices that tell fisheries service enforcement agents where each boat is at all times.

Additional high-tech devices, including real-time electronic reporting of the catch and onboard cameras, are also being considered.

''People are going to resist change, but if you want to have accountable management, you have to have the tools to do it,'' said Peter Baker, fishing program director for the Cape Cod Commercial Hook Fishermen's Association.

Many feel that, with the Magnuson-Stevens Act revision and widespread discontent over current regulations, more fishermen will be turning to self-management. It's an appealing option when compared with the difficulty of staying in business with only 30 days to fish.

In the 1990s, Chatham day-

boat fishermen - like Our - typically fished for 100 or more days each year. Faced with only 30 days a year to fish, Our, and other New England fishermen, bought up boats and the permits that came with them. Our now owns 10 boats and permits. Regulations allow him to combine the total fishing days into one boat, giving him a total of 130 days at sea.

But while that arrangement got Our enough fishing days to remain profitable, it did not help the effort to restore fish populations.

''What they're doing now is not working to the nth degree,'' Chatham gill-net fisherman Mark Smith said. ''We're trying. Guys want to see the fishing come back.''

Doug Fraser can be reached at [email protected].

(Published: December 13, 2006)

reelapeelin
12-14-2006, 10:04 AM
That's a great idea to have thew fishermen regulate their own catch...but if they're REALLY serious about not depleating stocks, they've got to BAN gil-nets (boy, that'll pour pi$$ in the coffee ::) )...


...as a commercial fisherman, MJ...do you really want a camera in your boat...probably at your expense ... those fisheries dudes might get to see MORE than they want to :o ...

Sean
12-14-2006, 11:46 AM
A step in the right direction... It will be a sadd day when the commercial fisherman is no more.

macojoe
12-14-2006, 02:22 PM
Well I just commercial now just to stay away from the limited recreational limits.

The Dragers have done a job here and the fishing is not what it use to be!!
The Dragers use to stay 3 miles off shore to do there thing, but now they are seen any were that the water is deep enough to get there nets down!

I called DMF when I first saw the Dragers at the Vinyard some 8 years ago, they said as long as they stay 100 yards from the shore they are leagle!

I was how can this be?? This is a recreational fishing area and lots of boat traffic to and from the Vinyard all summer.

Well 8 years ago I and one other guy could catch are rod & reel limit of 200# in about 4 hours and have a lot of nice Jumbo in the mix.
Now 8 years later your lucky if you get 100# and they are all small 14" fish!

The Dragers still go there, but they do not spend all there time any more! I have seen there boats come to the fish house and all they have are Jumbos!!

How can this be?? They say they no cull there fish? So what is it they only catch Jumbos?

They say they never catch Bi-Catch, but at the same time they say they want to keep the horseshoe crabs to sell? and during the squid season they are able to keep 100# Fluke as you got it Bi-catch!

They can bring a camera on my boat anytime they want!! I really do believe in only catching what I am allowed and i do not cull!

DMF is the real problem here!! they are the ones that allow the Dragers come into new areas, they allow them to drag near shore, and they are the one afraid to do what they know needs to be done!

There was a show on TV the other night that said if we keep going at this rate there will be no fish in the ocean by 2050, and even thought I think there will be something, it won't be near shore like the fishing we all know and love!

I will not be here to see it and neither will most of here, But are kids and grand kids will, and its a shame they will never be able to enjoy what we all now love!

bigshrimpin
12-14-2006, 03:36 PM
MJ is right on . . . those draggers are raping the ocean.

I've fished the same area as MJ for 10 years. Nearly everyday you could catch 200lbs of fluke rod and reel. Before the quota went to 200lb there were days where I caught 300lbs by myself rod and reel. Draggers lobbied the DMF to open the area. The did in 2003? and you're lucky if you catch 8 legal fish there now. In less than 3 years that area got wiped out.

Just like MJ said . . . Because the daily limit is 200lbs . . . Draggers would ride that area until they caught 200lb of JUMBOS (4+lb fluke). Jumbo's bring the highest per/LB market value. Anything short of a jumbo is dumped on the hot metal deck of the trawler, while the fisherman cull trough their catch. By the time the fisherman are done cherry picking all the jumbos . . . Nearly all the bycatch is DEAD. Some are crispy from sitting out in the sun, some are beaten to death in the nets, Some are killed from the fisherman stepping all over them, Some are fck'd up because of being dropped on the deck. Everything that isn't a Jumbo Fluke is shoveled back over and 99% of it is DEAD.

In any given day I will venture to guess that several thousand pounds of fluke come aboard one trawler. 200lb of fish is kept and the other three thousand pounds of fluke is now crab meat.
-------------------------------------------------------------------

Draggers are the #1 problem and no one at DMF has the balls to deal with it. When they do it will be a complete economic disaster for the industry. Even if DMF address the problem it will take years for stocks to return.

-------------------------------------------------------------------

bigshrimpin
12-14-2006, 03:58 PM
MJ - It's time to bring a Video Camera out there and film them.

It'd be the easiest thing to prove, just pull the DMF catch reports of the trawlers and compare the percentage to rod and reel folks. We know the mesh holes won't let 14" fluke escape.

Sean
12-14-2006, 03:59 PM
AS I am no expert on the subject, just what I read, it is common sence that the draggers A. need to stay off shore and B. need to be monitored and limited.
Hopefully lowering the size limit and monitoring the draggers will help minimize the bycatch waisting that accurs.
Fishing is one of, if not the oldest occupations in the world and I hope my childern will be aqble to witness it first havd instead of reading about it.

bigshrimpin
12-14-2006, 05:58 PM
I believe if Marine Fisheries outlawed wholesalers from paying more for different grades (sizes) of a particular species . . . you'd eliminate the "culling" that goes on w/o needing to spend resources monitoring the boats. That law alone would make a huge impact on the fish stocks.

There's another whole issue of the damage done to an ecosystem when you rake the bottom of inshore feeding grounds everyday (all day), but that's beyond my understanding.

bigshrimpin
12-14-2006, 10:25 PM
MJ - When I worked at Red Top Old guys used to come in the store and talk about swordfishing. Most of the best spots were not more than a few miles from where we fished for fluke.

macojoe
12-14-2006, 10:44 PM
Yes if they did away with priceing per size that would help alot!

They just need to band the dragers all toghter freom any inshore fishing!

There is talk every couple of years about a salt water lic!! Well I for one will never pay it till they stop all Dragers!

I have never seen a soward fish in the ocean and I am sure I never will!!

Lucky to see a cod any more!! Going to change the name of Cape Cod to Cape Codless!! :'(