Trump lies about Ketanji Brown Jackson

[bgreene]

Anyone watch ANY of Supreme Court Nominee Ketanji Brown Jacksons hearings ?
Wow notice how cool, calm, and respectful shes taken all questions especially from the likes of Lindsay Graham who repeatedly interrupted her as she answered questions .


Well Trump is absolutely lying about Brown at his rallies - where he COUNTS ON his followers to believe anything he says .
Trump claiming Brown herself was rude - which she absolutely wasnt in any way.

But trump knows many of his followers dont care about FACTS.


https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=7jpt35IUFU4

[Destroyer]

Anyone watch ANY of Supreme Court Nominee Ketanji Brown Jacksons hearings ?
Wow notice how cool, calm, and respectful shes taken all questions especially from the likes of Lindsay Graham who repeatedly interrupted her as she answered questions .


Well Trump is absolutely lying about Brown at his rallies - where he COUNTS ON his followers to believe anything he says .
Trump claiming Brown herself was rude - which she absolutely wasnt in any way.

But trump knows many of his followers dont care about FACTS.


https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=7jpt35IUFU4

I watched almost all of all 3 days. the "grilling" she got from Republicans, was mild at best. They should have taken lessons from the Democrats and tried to destroy her reputation like the Dems did to Kavanaugh. She lied to the entire nation when she said didn't know what a woman was. That's the person that you think should be elected to the Supreme court? No wonder the Country is in such bad shape when idiots applaud people like her.

.

[bgreene]

Kavanaugh was accused of sexual attack by a specific woman.

Brown is a solid candidate who was in no way rude during the grilling .

[bgreene]

Sounds like Brown will be the first female African American Supreme Court Justice

[scook]

And we all know that selecting people for important jobs is best done based on skin color and gender.

While it was certainly encouraging that the country was able to elect a person of color as president, confirming that while there’s clearly racism remaining, we are not a racist nation. Unfortunately, he was a very smooth politician but a very bad president, presiding over a huge worsening in race relations and pursuing policies that significantly hindered our much needed economic recovery.

[bgreene]

And we all know that selecting people for important jobs is best done based on skin color and gender.

While it was certainly encouraging that the country was able to elect a person of color as president, confirming that while there’s clearly racism remaining, we are not a racist nation. Unfortunately, he was a very smooth politician but a very bad president, presiding over a huge worsening in race relations and pursuing policies that significantly hindered our much needed economic recovery.

Wow you didn’t like Obama either hu ?
A very GOOD President

[scook]

Your evaluation of him has to do with his pursuit of things you agree with, well left of center, and that you ignore the destruction he did to our economy and race relations. I’d have thought you would be more concerned with the latter, but as you accuse Trump, he was very smooth and sounded good to his all in followers.

[bgreene]

Your evaluation of him has to do with his pursuit of things you agree with, well left of center, and that you ignore the destruction he did to our economy and race relations. I’d have thought you would be more concerned with the latter, but as you accuse Trump, he was very smooth and sounded good to his all in followers.

Wrong - Obama started the economy going - after Bush’s fiasco and by the time trump won our economy was doing very well.
And YES Obama was a gentleman .

[scook]

Let’s see - we can’t blame Biden for inflation and his blundering foreign policy, which are clearly his fault, but can blame Bush for something he had little or nothing to do with?

[bgreene]

Let’s see - we can’t blame Biden for inflation and his blundering foreign policy, which are clearly his fault, but can blame Bush for something he had little or nothing to do with?

Wrong again - Bush had everything to do with the approx $ 1 trillion spent attacking Iraq going after the wrong target after 911. But that’s old news, Bush still a better man than trump will ever be.

[scook]

Definitely the wrong target after Saddam, without provocation, attacked our Navy ship, killing American sailors, held Americans hostage, invaded a neighboring country, etc.

[bgreene]

Definitely the wrong target after Saddam, without provocation, attacked our Navy ship, killing American sailors, held Americans hostage, invaded a neighboring country, etc.

It was Osama bin Laden who actually plotted the 911 attack - not Sadam.
And it was President Obama who ordered the attack that killed bin Laden.

[Destroyer]

It was Osama bin Laden who actually plotted the 911 attack - not Sadam.
And it was President Obama who ordered the attack that killed bin Laden.

But it was President Bush that provided the almost 4 years of intel that finally found Bin Laden and allowed Obama to order the attack.

.

[scook]

I seem to recall that it was credible intel, along with Sadam’s persistent threats that he had and would use weapons of mass destruction that started the Iraq situation and that it was pursued by Bush, the younger, for a number of reasons.

I agree with Destroyer that Obama gets credit for no more than allowing the mission that took out bin Laden. An interesting fact reported by, I think a Navy Seal is that the intel team that located bin Laden was made up of entirely women - women who actually earned their positions by superior work, not selected for their jobs “because they weren’t men”.

Biden is vigorously weakening our military and intel services with he’s far left, extreme gender and color driven promotion schemes. You don’t have to do that to get diversity - just don’t discriminate based on those factors.

[bgreene]

I seem to recall that it was credible intel, along with Sadam’s persistent threats that he had and would use weapons of mass destruction that started the Iraq situation and that it was pursued by Bush, the younger, for a number of reasons.

I agree with Destroyer that Obama gets credit for no more than allowing the mission that took out bin Laden. An interesting fact reported by, I think a Navy Seal is that the intel team that located bin Laden was made up of entirely women - women who actually earned their positions by superior work, not selected for their jobs “because they weren’t men”.

Biden is vigorously weakening our military and intel services with he’s far left, extreme gender and color driven promotion schemes. You don’t have to do that to get diversity - just don’t discriminate based on those factors.

Sadam was found NOT to have weapons of mass destruction .
You agree with destroyer - the only poster of vulgar cursing rants while you pretend to have issue with the slightest return of insult . Hypocrite .

[scook]

Your ignorance of decision making is astounding. An executive has to act on the best information he or she has. All credible intel as the time was that he had weapons of mass destruction and was intending to use them. What he was “found” to have later only means that the intel wasn’t correct, not that a bad decision was made.

There you go again with your all or nothing thinking. It’s not OK to agree with someone who’s correct, because you take exception with how they described you? Destroyer used different words than I have, but accurately described your asinine behavior. Your incessant, boring, droning repeating of your opinion on the subject as a self righteous tool to deflect and avoid actual, honest discussion is the height of hypocrisy - you are the hypocrite. You are the only poster using dishonest, non responsive foolishness.

[bgreene]

Your ignorance of decision making is astounding. An executive has to act on the best information he or she has. All credible intel as the time was that he had weapons of mass destruction and was intending to use them. What he was “found” to have later only means that the intel wasn’t correct, not that a bad decision was made.

There you go again with your all or nothing thinking. It’s not OK to agree with someone who’s correct, because you take exception with how they described you? Destroyer used different words than I have, but accurately described your asinine behavior. Your incessant, boring, droning repeating of your opinion on the subject as a self righteous tool to deflect and avoid actual, honest discussion is the height of hypocrisy - you are the hypocrite. You are the only poster using dishonest, non responsive foolishness.

FACTS indicate otherwise scook. FACTS are what I post and some of my own opinions too.

FACTS such as and including :
1. Trump LOST the election by large margin - but LIES that he won.
2. Trump could have but didn’t speak up much sooner against the attack on our Capitol .
3. Bin Laden was behind the 911 attack NOT Sadam - and Dick Chaney lied about Sadam having nucs.
4. You repeatedly posted that you are “ done arguing” but you continue . Hahaha funny.

I’m honest, steady , and fact check rather than believe all the lying cheating dictator loving traitor Trump says . Putin is a murderous tyranny dictator guilty of war crimes and trump loves him and takes his word over our our American intell people.
Disgusting .

[scook]

No, facts don’t indicate otherwise. If you disagree with my first paragraph, you are simply ignorant of decision making practice, well accepted by competent executives and highly respected executive education programs.

Your “fact checking” relies on biased, agended liberal “fact checkers” who are not reliable purveyors of the whole truth. Your incessant blathering about the election is irrelevant to this conversation (which you avoid engaging in), Dick Cheney did not lie about nukes, he relied on intel.

Putin is in fact a murderous tyrant dictator, who Trump understands, probably is impressed with his ability to hold control in a murderous environment, but most certainly doesn’t love and whose BS, he doesn’t tolerate. You notice that Putin’s invasions of Ukraine happened during weak, foolish, incompetent democrat administrations, not while Trump was president.

As for my posting after finding you to be a waste of time - your blather gets so egregious that some correction of the record becomes worthwhile - occasionally I try to appeal to what might be a tiny bit of sense in your very off track mind - that’s probably a waste of time, but hope springs eternal.

[bgreene]

No, facts don’t indicate otherwise. If you disagree with my first paragraph, you are simply ignorant of decision making practice, well accepted by competent executives and highly respected executive education programs.

Your “fact checking” relies on biased, agended liberal “fact checkers” who are not reliable purveyors of the whole truth. Your incessant blathering about the election is irrelevant to this conversation (which you avoid engaging in), Dick Cheney did not lie about nukes, he relied on intel.

Putin is in fact a murderous tyrant dictator, who Trump understands, probably is impressed with his ability to hold control in a murderous environment, but most certainly doesn’t love and whose BS, he doesn’t tolerate. You notice that Putin’s invasions of Ukraine happened during weak, foolish, incompetent democrat administrations, not while Trump was president.

As for my posting after finding you to be a waste of time - your blather gets so egregious that some correction of the record becomes worthwhile - occasionally I try to appeal to what might be a tiny bit of sense in your very off track mind - that’s probably a waste of time, but hope springs eternal.

Always the insults from the hypocrite who cries about insults .
So now your excuse for returning after posting at least twice that you were done is “ you feel obligated “. Hahaha whatever excuses work for you .
Me …..I don’t make excuses because I don’t have any need to back pedal .
But you go on

[scook]

You just can’t help yourself. If it weren’t so pathetic, it would be laughable.

[bgreene]

You just can’t help yourself. If it weren’t so pathetic, it would be laughable.

Pathetic ? You announced you’re done arguing twice then come back each time !

Talk about “ can’t help yourself “. Haahahaha jokes on you - again

[scook]

You really should get some help - your behavior is infantile.

[bgreene]

You really should get some help - your behavior is infantile.

Now you’re playing the “ get help “ game.
No vulgar cursing rants from me but you write about needing help.

What you SHOULD WRITE is “ yeh I wrote claiming not posting anymore but just can’t stop posting because you enjoy it.

But THAT would be the TRUTH which you trumpers avoid.

Me, I’ve ALWAYS been honest on this site .

And Brown was mature, civil and respectful in her Supreme Court hearings while TRUMP LIED that she was rude. Trumps the LIAR

[scook]

I don’t think you’ll find much agreement here that you’re honest and post facts and truth, since you’ve repeatedly proven otherwise.

Your behavior continues to be infantile and you don’t seem able to control it. You are only able to deflect away from honest discussion and post childish insults using all or nothing, black and white thinking, incessant repeating of blather and blatantly dishonest accusations against people who don’t agree with you and have the temerity to correct you.

You know, people from widely different positions on the political spectrum can have honest, non combative productive discussions about things on which they strongly disagree. It requires an ability to listen without being instantly reactive and to process discussion reasonably.

[bgreene]

I don***8217;t think you***8217;ll find much agreement here that you***8217;re honest and post facts and truth, since you***8217;ve repeatedly proven otherwise.

Your behavior continues to be infantile and you don***8217;t seem able to control it. You are only able to deflect away from honest discussion and post childish insults using all or nothing, black and white thinking, incessant repeating of blather and blatantly dishonest accusations against people who don***8217;t agree with you and have the temerity to correct you.

You know, people from widely different positions on the political spectrum can have honest, non combative productive discussions about things on which they strongly disagree. It requires an ability to listen without being instantly reactive and to process discussion reasonably.

Well youre wrong again mr insult .
Try writing your own thread.
And make another announcement that youre done arguing - then return for more - again

[scook]

Once again - your post is 100% non responsive.

[bgreene]

Once again - your post is 100% non responsive.

Geezzzz you’re a control freak.

Sure I responded - I advised you to announce your departure “ again “

[scook]

No, you affirmed that your behavior is that of an epic jackass.

[bgreene]

No, you affirmed that your behavior is that of an epic jackass.

Do you deny you posted TWICE you’re don’t arguing ?
And returned to argue again time each time ?

You’re so frustrated - resorting to the insults - you need a time out from posting ……again.

[scook]

More jackassery.

[bgreene]

More jackassery.

Yes you have become one but I’m too polite to write it

[bgreene]

Trump spouts all kinds of false claims at his rallies - and you starry eyed followers lap it up like like thirsty dogs.
Trump says “ I heard K Brown was very rude , very rude “ and his mob responds with boooos to Brown.
Meanwhile the TRUTH IS Brown has handled herself with total poise, courtesy, respect and dignity in the hearings.

She is very likely to be confirmed into our Supreme Court.

[scook]

You’re not particularly polite, unless you consider snarky, completely off-topic replies to be polite. It certainly appears that you think they’re clever.

My being disgusted with your blather and ceasing posting probably shouldn’t be considered a contractual obligation, though your all or nothing, black and white thinking wouldn’t understand that. When you start up a fresh line of foolishness, I’ll decide whether to respond and I’m sure that’s offensive to you, being yourself the control freak on the site.

It’s unfortunate, because, as I’ve acknowledged several times, you do OCCASIONALLY have a legitimate point.

[bgreene]

You’re not particularly polite, unless you consider snarky, completely off-topic replies to be polite. It certainly appears that you think they’re clever.

My being disgusted with your blather and ceasing posting probably shouldn’t be considered a contractual obligation, though your all or nothing, black and white thinking wouldn’t understand that. When you start up a fresh line of foolishness, I’ll decide whether to respond and I’m sure that’s offensive to you, being yourself the control freak on the site.

It’s unfortunate, because, as I’ve acknowledged several times, you do OCCASIONALLY have a legitimate point.

“ disgusted with my blather says scook”
Well……for a guy who falsely claims disgusted you sure post a lot !!!
HaHahaha more BS from you - you love it.

I’m also not the one who announced being done arguing…..twice . That was YOU !

Truth, honesty, facts. It’s so easy and doesn’t require covering ones tracks as you and destroyer struggle to do .

[scook]

You have completely lost contact with reality.

[Pipe_Dream]

You have completely lost contact with reality.

That began about 10 pages back in the Political Forum. It's been an interesting progression -- or would that be regression? -- since then.

[bgreene]

You have completely lost contact with reality.

Poor little scookie can’t handle the truth ……
Announce you’re “ done arguing again “

Hahahaah make it 3 times !

[scook]

If you had any idea how idiotic you sound, you would be likely to change your behavior.

[oteps]

This is the lady that lied during the hearings right? Just want to make sure we are talking about the same person.

[bgreene]

This is the lady that lied during the hearings right? Just want to make sure we are talking about the same person.

Oh here we go - scookie claiming K Brown is a liar.
About what ? What lie ?

[scook]

Do you even read posts before going off on your clumsy attempts at deflecting, disrespectful off topic foolishness?

[bgreene]

Do you even read posts before going off on your clumsy attempts at deflecting, disrespectful off topic foolishness?

What ? Are you announcing departure from posting again ?

[scook]

Please explain how this response has anything to do with what I just wrote.

[bgreene]

Please explain how this response has anything to do with what I just wrote.

Figure it out .

[scook]

Ah, I figured it out. You either can’t read, you’re crazy or just not very bright.

You ascribed a post by someone else to me because you didn’t bother to read it, or were so out of control in your anger and frustration and think being snarky is so clever that you just posted blather, instead of rereading and correcting YOUR mistake.

You continue to act like an idiot.

[bgreene]

Ah, I figured it out. You either can’t read, you’re crazy or just not very bright.

You ascribed a post by someone else to me because you didn’t bother to read it, or were so out of control in your anger and frustration and think being snarky is so clever that you just posted blather, instead of rereading and correcting YOUR mistake.

You continue to act like an idiot.

I'm sorry - did you say something ? Hahaahah
Non stop insults from scookie.......the guy who whines about insults.

Try to calm down. Got a Wellcraft V20 or 21 ? That would be nice, go use it.
" please "

[scook]

You are deteriorating further and further - can’t acknowledge a simple mistake, or was it just a simple lie because you’re so out of control with rage, frustration and control issues which I point out, along with your other lunacy that you just decided to make another clumsy attempt at insults and condescension.

Remember there must be at least some respect for your opinions for an insult to be remotely effective. Yours are not.

[bgreene]

You are deteriorating further and further - can’t acknowledge a simple mistake, or was it just a simple lie because you’re so out of control with rage, frustration and control issues which I point out, along with your other lunacy that you just decided to make another clumsy attempt at insults and condescension.

Remember there must be at least some respect for your opinions for an insult to be remotely effective. Yours are not.

Scookie ! Scookie !
The crowd is fired up in anticipation of Scook aka “The Angry Wellcraft poster” taking the stage to announce if he’s done arguing for yet a 3rd time !!!!!
Indeed the world anxiously awaits !

Stay tuned

[scook]

You evoke no emotion, just disappointment and disgust at your off the rails behavior.

[bgreene]

You evoke no emotion, just disappointment and disgust at your off the rails behavior.

Relax a bit ….you come across brittle as an old dried piece of wood.

[oteps]

Oh here we go - scookie claiming K Brown is a liar.
About what ? What lie ?

She was asked "what is a woman" and she said "I dont know" How does a person not know that? You cant tell me she doesnt know.

[bgreene]

She was asked "what is a woman" and she said "I dont know" How does a person not know that? You cant tell me she doesnt know.

Yeh read about that trap they tried on Brown and she wouldn’t take the bait.
Define woman, then try and force gender nonsense .

https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/2022/03/25/ketanji-brown-jackson-woman/

[scook]

About the kind of excuses you’d expect from the WAPO. The questions tried to get at how she would think about issues like a transgender “women” cleaning up in athletic competitions, since “she’s” actually a man, is it OK to allow trans “girls/women” to use female restrooms, showers, etc. in schools, so horny boys can fake being trans and get their looks in, etc.

Very legitimate questions, unless you’re on the far left like bgreene - then they’re just partisan Republican BS.

[bgreene]

About the kind of excuses you***8217;d expect from the WAPO. The questions tried to get at how she would think about issues like a transgender ***8220;women***8221; cleaning up in athletic competitions, since ***8220;she***8217;s***8221; actually a man, is it OK to allow trans ***8220;girls/women***8221; to use female restrooms, showers, etc. in schools, so horny boys can fake being trans and get their looks in, etc.

Very legitimate questions, unless youre on the far left like bgreene - then theyre just partisan Republican BS.

Bottomless pit this whole gender nonsense to me. Let people be what they want to be and I just dont care. Is a woman defined by breasts, vag , uterus ? What of the person whos lacking one part ? Just leave it alone .


Brown did the right thing and avoided this nonsense.
Much more important things to judge on, for which she is apparently quite experienced .

[scook]

So we should just let “trans women”, who are really men (I think we have an adequate handle on DNA to determine the sex of an individual) compete in legitimate women’s sports and win everything by a wide margin, or allow boys who want to look at naked girls fake being trans and get away with it?

Have you actually given the issue any serious thought?

The judge did what all nominees do - she didn’t answer questions that would give the opposition talking points, but there’s a pretty good argument that she lied when she said she couldn’t define a woman. The left can argue the opposite, but there are objective ways to determine the sex of an individual.

[bgreene]

Could be but personally I’m indifferent to this .

[Pipe_Dream]

Are you married?

[bgreene]

Are you married?

Yup and kids too.
I just don’t care what other people want to be….live and let live so long as doesn’t hurt others

[scook]

Well, it was pretty clearly explained to you how it hurts others in some cases, but it’s fine to be indifferent, just like you’re indifferent to the rampant violence promoted and supported by the far left mob you follow. Off the rails and indifferent - now there’s the picture of a concerned, patriotic American.

[Destroyer]

Bottomless pit this whole gender nonsense to me. Let people be what they want to be and I just dont care. Is a woman defined by breasts, vag , uterus ? What of the person whos lacking one part ? Just leave it alone .


Brown did the right thing and avoided this nonsense.
Much more important things to judge on, for which she is apparently quite experienced .

There's Greene, being VULGAR on this site. Using all those VULGAR words. It's only a matter of time before he starts cursing also. Ewwww..... You're a disgrace to this site Greene and everyone on it ...

.

[bgreene]

There's Greene, being VULGAR on this site. Using all those VULGAR words. It's only a matter of time before he starts cursing also. Ewwww..... You're a disgrace to this site Greene and everyone on it ...

.

Bitter old destroyer lying as usual .
There’s nothing to see here - except your lies

[Pipe_Dream]

Yup and kids too.
I just don’t care what other people want to be….live and let live so long as doesn’t hurt others

To a woman or a man?

[oteps]

Bottomless pit this whole gender nonsense to me. Let people be what they want to be and I just dont care. Is a woman defined by breasts, vag , uterus ? What of the person whos lacking one part ? Just leave it alone .


Brown did the right thing and avoided this nonsense.
Much more important things to judge on, for which she is apparently quite experienced .

She didnt avoid the question, she answered "I dont know" THat is a lie, how does a grown woman not know what a woman is? Joe is the one that said he is going to nominate a black woman, right? If she doesnt know what a woman is why is it important to have a woman take this job?

[bgreene]

The judge declined to answer the question in biological terms. Instead, she answered truthfully: “I know that I am a woman,” she said.

[scook]

She didn’t answer the question. She, from her perspective, could probably have honestly answered that she knew biologically, but from the legal/human rights side, she would have to reserve judgment until she was hearing a case. So she wasn’t truthful and seems pretty clear she lied, as lawyers, particularly trial lawyers, are very inclined to do.

[Pipe_Dream]

The judge declined to answer the question in biological terms. Instead, she answered truthfully: “I know that I am a woman,” she said.

Are you married to a man or a woman?

[bgreene]

Are you married to a man or a woman?

I’m married to a woman but I have nothing against anyone same sex married , transgender whatever .
You ?

[Pipe_Dream]

I’m married to a woman

How do you know? Are you a biologist?

[bgreene]

How do you know? Are you a biologist?

You’re about as clever as road kill …..
Hahaha……

[Destroyer]

You’re about as clever as road kill …..
Hahaha……

Can't you answer the question? Are you married to a man or a woman? And how do you know for sure?

.

[bgreene]

K Brown Will become part of our Supreme Court .

[bgreene]

Donald Trump absolutely lied about K Brown Jackson - this is EXACTLY what Trump said :

“ Judge Jackson was unbelievably disrespectful to Republican Senators that in many cases were really nicely asking questions," Trump said. "She had total disdain and even hatred for them."

Trump said this at his rally in Georgia - and his crowd boooo’d about Brown in response.

THE TRUTH HOWEVER is Brown was VERY POLITE - NOT RUDE AT ALL as she was grilled and frequently interrupted by Republicans as she answered questions .

This is ONE EXAMPLE of why TRUMP must be fact checked - because he’s a lying cheating con man traitor to all Americans.

[Pipe_Dream]

K Brown Will become part of our Supreme Court .

Yes, indeed.

The first black woman confirmed to the Supreme Court can't say what a woman is. I guess we'll never know what you're married to.

[bgreene]

Yes, indeed.

The first black woman confirmed to the Supreme Court can't say what a woman is. I guess we'll never know what you're married to.

I’m not married to a what …..you’re looking for trouble

[Destroyer]

I’m not married to a what …..you’re looking for trouble

I'm sorry, are you threatening Pipe_Dream? I just want to be clear here that if you are you will be banned from this site quickly. Choose your next words carefully.

.

[bgreene]

I'm sorry, are you threatening Pipe_Dream? I just want to be clear here that if you are you will be banned from this site quickly. Choose your next words carefully.

.

Trouble is commenting about another mans wife .
The trouble is the risk of returned insults.

I’m sorry - if you repeat vulgar cursing rants you may get banned from this site

[Destroyer]

Trouble is commenting about another mans wife .
The trouble is the risk of returned insults.

I’m sorry - if you repeat vulgar cursing rants you may get banned from this site

The same applies to you. You're the one that's using the vulgar words and curses.

.

[bgreene]

The same applies to you. You're the one that's using the vulgar words and curses.

.

There’s something wrong with you

[Pipe_Dream]

I’m not married to a what …..you’re looking for trouble

No, looking for answers. Our new SCOTUS justice said she can’t define what a woman is. I was wondering if you could.

[bgreene]

No, looking for answers. Our new SCOTUS justice said she can’t define what a woman is. I was wondering if you could.

Brown was avoiding the trap .
Defining what a woman is ? Perhaps the real answer is chromosomal .
How do you define a woman ? By body parts alone ?

[Destroyer]

Brown was avoiding the trap .
Defining what a woman is ? Perhaps the real answer is chromosomal .
How do you define a woman ? By body parts alone ?

How in the world could that be a trap? Excluding hermaphrodites, there are ONLY 2 biological choices. Male and Female. Anyone who thinks there are more, that they are different than what they are born as has a mental condition, but that does not change their biological sex. If Jackson can't (or won't) define what a woman is that's a sure indicator of her unfitness for the position that she was just confirmed to. And lets not forget that she ONLY was nominated to that position because she is a black woman and Biden promised that he would nominate a black woman to the supreme court if he was elected. NOT because of her qualifications (which are sketchy at best) but purely for racist reasons.

.

[oteps]

I guess its now ok to hire someone based on their sex and skin color.

[bgreene]

How in the world could that be a trap? Excluding hermaphrodites, there are ONLY 2 biological choices. Male and Female. Anyone who thinks there are more, that they are different than what they are born as has a mental condition, but that does not change their biological sex. If Jackson can't (or won't) define what a woman is that's a sure indicator of her unfitness for the position that she was just confirmed to. And lets not forget that she ONLY was nominated to that position because she is a black woman and Biden promised that he would nominate a black woman to the supreme court if he was elected. NOT because of her qualifications (which are sketchy at best) but purely for racist reasons.

.

How do you define a woman ? Serious answer requested

[scook]

If there’s any doubt, look at DNA. There may be reasons not to treat people “identifying” as as sex, not their own unfairly, but that shouldn’t be a reason to allow genetic males to unfairly compete in women’s sports or have access to women’s private facilities like restrooms and showers where there’s huge potential for abuse.

She dodged the questions and, yes lied, to not give the opposition any talking points that would jeopardize her chances of confirmation. She will now move to a position where she can press her liberal agenda, without regard for the clear limitations of the constitutional language.

[bgreene]

If there’s any doubt, look at DNA. There may be reasons not to treat people “identifying” as as sex, not their own unfairly, but that shouldn’t be a reason to allow genetic males to unfairly compete in women’s sports or have access to women’s private facilities like restrooms and showers where there’s huge potential for abuse.

She dodged the questions and, yes lied, to not give the opposition any talking points that would jeopardize her chances of confirmation. She will now move to a position where she can press her liberal agenda, without regard for the clear limitations of the constitutional language.

“ without regard for clear limitations of the constitution “ …..wow that’s not likely fair to state or accurate to assume .
But that’s you’re opinion .

[scook]

It’s only sensible to believe that she will try to legislate from the bench as other liberal justices have done and would continue to do if they had the majority.

[Destroyer]

How do you define a woman ? Serious answer requested

Fair question. My answer is that a woman (female) person is a person capable of bearing children. They are born with a reproductive system consisting of fallopian tubes, a womb, a cervix and a birth canal, plus a whole lot of other organs all native to members of the female sex and ONLY native to them. Females have two X chromosomes in their cells, while males have both an X and a Y chromosome in their cells. Egg cells all contain an X chromosome, while sperm cells from males contain either an X or Y chromosome.

I'm not a biologist, yet it was relatively simple for me to answer your question. Now, if I can answer your question with relative ease, you have to ask yourself, if she's as smart as people say she is, why couldn't (or wouldn't) Judge Jackson answer the same question? And since she is a woman, I'm certain beyond a shadow of a doubt that she knows all the body (organ) parts of a female. Which means she lied before the Senate, which I believe is a crime.

People that think they are the opposite of their birth sex have a mental abrogation. Even people that have undergone surgery to make themselves look more like their desired sex still are not true men or women. It is impossible for a male to have fallopian tubes and a womb or a female to have a prostate and working testes. They may *look* like the opposite sex, they may dress like and adopt the mannerisms of that sex, but in fact, they are still very much their birth gender. Their chromosomes will still be either XX for a female or XY for a male.

I hope that answers your question.

.

[bgreene]

Fair question. My answer is that a woman (female) person is a person capable of bearing children. They are born with a reproductive system consisting of fallopian tubes, a womb, a cervix and a birth canal, plus a whole lot of other organs all native to members of the female sex and ONLY native to them. Females have two X chromosomes in their cells, while males have both an X and a Y chromosome in their cells. Egg cells all contain an X chromosome, while sperm cells from males contain either an X or Y chromosome.

I'm not a biologist, yet it was relatively simple for me to answer your question. Now, if I can answer your question with relative ease, you have to ask yourself, if she's as smart as people say she is, why couldn't (or wouldn't) Judge Jackson answer the same question? And since she is a woman, I'm certain beyond a shadow of a doubt that she knows all the body (organ) parts of a female. Which means she lied before the Senate, which I believe is a crime.

People that think they are the opposite of their birth sex have a mental abrogation. Even people that have undergone surgery to make themselves look more like their desired sex still are not true men or women. It is impossible for a male to have fallopian tubes and a womb or a female to have a prostate and working testes. They may *look* like the opposite sex, they may dress like and adopt the mannerisms of that sex, but in fact, they are still very much their birth gender. Their chromosomes will still be either XX for a female or XY for a male.

I hope that answers your question.

.

You’re a liar and a fraud so whatever you write is irrelevant .

[Pipe_Dream]

How do you define a woman ? Serious answer requested

Fair question. My answer is that a woman (female) person is a person capable of bearing children. They are born with a reproductive system consisting of fallopian tubes, a womb, a cervix and a birth canal, plus a whole lot of other organs all native to members of the female sex and ONLY native to them. Females have two X chromosomes in their cells, while males have both an X and a Y chromosome in their cells. Egg cells all contain an X chromosome, while sperm cells from males contain either an X or Y chromosome.

I'm not a biologist, yet it was relatively simple for me to answer your question. Now, if I can answer your question with relative ease, you have to ask yourself, if she's as smart as people say she is, why couldn't (or wouldn't) Judge Jackson answer the same question? And since she is a woman, I'm certain beyond a shadow of a doubt that she knows all the body (organ) parts of a female. Which means she lied before the Senate, which I believe is a crime.

People that think they are the opposite of their birth sex have a mental abrogation. Even people that have undergone surgery to make themselves look more like their desired sex still are not true men or women. It is impossible for a male to have fallopian tubes and a womb or a female to have a prostate and working testes. They may *look* like the opposite sex, they may dress like and adopt the mannerisms of that sex, but in fact, they are still very much their birth gender. Their chromosomes will still be either XX for a female or XY for a male.

I hope that answers your question.

.

You’re a liar and a fraud so whatever you write is irrelevant .

If you really believe that, then why did you ask him your "serious question?"

:haha:

[bgreene]

If you really believe that, then why did you ask him your "serious question?"

:haha:

Suddenly pipe here CARES about comment quality …..but NO COMMENTS from pipe when destroyer sent multiple vulgar cursing rants to me .

Same as how violent law breaking mobs behave - such as the trump supporting attackers on our capitol police . Supporting each other’s bad behavior - with excuses .

Me - I’d tell anyone friend, Biden or trump lover what’s right .
Right is right …..wrong is wrong. But trump leads the weak of character to do wrong .

[Pipe_Dream]

Suddenly pipe here CARES about comment quality …..but NO COMMENTS from pipe when destroyer sent multiple vulgar cursing rants to me .


I've always cared about comment quality which is why it's so fun to respond to you. So destroyer said something to you once and your responses to him since then are all about attacking him for that post. Yeah boy, that's some quality.

[Destroyer]

Fair question. My answer is that a woman (female) person is a person capable of bearing children. They are born with a reproductive system consisting of fallopian tubes, a womb, a cervix and a birth canal, plus a whole lot of other organs all native to members of the female sex and ONLY native to them. Females have two X chromosomes in their cells, while males have both an X and a Y chromosome in their cells. Egg cells all contain an X chromosome, while sperm cells from males contain either an X or Y chromosome.

I'm not a biologist, yet it was relatively simple for me to answer your question. Now, if I can answer your question with relative ease, you have to ask yourself, if she's as smart as people say she is, why couldn't (or wouldn't) Judge Jackson answer the same question? And since she is a woman, I'm certain beyond a shadow of a doubt that she knows all the body (organ) parts of a female. Which means she lied before the Senate, which I believe is a crime.

People that think they are the opposite of their birth sex have a mental abrogation. Even people that have undergone surgery to make themselves look more like their desired sex still are not true men or women. It is impossible for a male to have fallopian tubes and a womb or a female to have a prostate and working testes. They may *look* like the opposite sex, they may dress like and adopt the mannerisms of that sex, but in fact, they are still very much their birth gender. Their chromosomes will still be either XX for a female or XY for a male.

I hope that answers your question.

You***8217;re a liar and a fraud so whatever you write is irrelevant .

You know, I spent a fair amount of time crafting that reply. I *thought* that perhaps you had asked a legitimate question, so I tried to answer it the same way. There were no insults, there was only straight forward scientific facts to answer your question.

So how did you answer my response? Did you show even a hint of civility? Did you even try to respond in kind? No, you did not. You responded with more of your blathering, nonsensical drivel. You didn't even bother to attempt to debate it, you just resorted to your stock in trade, which was to throw personal insults. No wonder the Bass Barn banned you from their site. As I've said before, you have only yourself to blame for that. You have become what is known on the internet as a troll. And for your information, trolls are not welcome on this site.

.

[bgreene]

Continued false insults from destroyer .

The fact about bass barn - moderator, intolerant of any posts against trump allowed his pals to post vulgarity that makes yours look tame . Really obscene stuff.
My political data frustrated him to the point that he banned me.

It was so bad on that forum the site ownership company in Canada was investigating multiple reports of the vulgarity allowed from the moderators friends . Bass Barn had very specific guidelines of decency to follow that were ignored .

K Browns record is solid and likely she’ll do a very good job in our Supreme Court.
Trump LIED that she was horribly rude and mean during her hearings - she was nothing of the sort, but professional, and courteous . This is a FACT

[Destroyer]

Continued false insults from destroyer .

The fact about bass barn - moderator, intolerant of any posts against trump allowed his pals to post vulgarity that makes yours look tame . Really obscene stuff.
My political data frustrated him to the point that he banned me.

It was so bad on that forum the site ownership company in Canada was investigating multiple reports of the vulgarity allowed from the moderators friends . Bass Barn had very specific guidelines of decency to follow that were ignored .

K Browns record is solid and likely she’ll do a very good job in our Supreme Court.
Trump LIED that she was horribly rude and mean during her hearings - she was nothing of the sort, but professional, and courteous . This is a FACT

False insults? where?

When will you learn that an opinion is not a lie. If President trump said he thought she was rude, etc, that is his opinion and he's entitled to it, in much the same way that you are entitled to yours. Both are exactly that. Opinions. NOT LIES.

.

[bgreene]

False insults? where?

When will you learn that an opinion is not a lie. If President trump said he thought she was rude, etc, that is his opinion and he's entitled to it, in much the same way that you are entitled to yours. Both are exactly that. Opinions. NOT LIES.

.

If something is not the truth in any way - then saying the opposite is not an “ opinion “ it’s FACTUALLY WRONG . In this case, Trump slanders Brown .

Also no need to act professorial with the “ when will I learn “ statement.
I call a spade a spade with accuracy .

[Destroyer]

If something is not the truth in any way - then saying the opposite is not an “ opinion “ it’s FACTUALLY WRONG . In this case, Trump slanders Brown .

Also no need to act professorial with the “ when will I learn “ statement.
I call a spade a spade with accuracy .

Hmmm... If Trump believes what he said about Jackson how is it not an opinion? It is what he believes. Is he not entitled to his opinions, in much the same way as you or I?

.

[scook]

Not true in any way? Her blatant lying about not knowing what a woman is isn’t being disrespectful to her questioners?

[bgreene]

Not true in any way? Her blatant lying about not knowing what a woman is isn’t being disrespectful to her questioners?

You’re really reaching here to cover Trumps slander .

[scook]

Not at all, I listened to enough of her questioning to agree that she was very poised and seemingly pleasant and responsive, until she lied. I think lying in that setting, as in others, is disrespectful.

You claim to disapprove of lying - you incessantly manufacture (or more accurately, cite your favorite professional far left liars) “Trump lies” and attempt to sell them here.