Global Warming

[Destroyer]

While I don't normally agree with everything that Dick Morris says, he does, at times, seem to hit the nail right on the head. His commentaries about global warming clearly fit in that category. Facts and figures go a long way towards proving a point. You can see it here.

http://www.dickmorris.com/global-warming-dick-morris-tv-lunch-alert/?utm_source=dmreports&utm_medium=dmreports&utm_campaign=dmreports

[Pipe_Dream]

I like to believe that I am open-minded and am not a "denier" about global warming, er, climate change or about any other scientific or political issue. On the issue of global warming, er climate change, I do not believe that the science has made its case, and in particular I do not trust the UN to deliver the goods with regard to anything scientific. When I read this fellow's comments (link below) I found myself in complete agreement.

http://nypost.com/2013/12/05/global-warming-proof-is-evaporating/

But, but . . .

Al Sharpton!
http://www.truthrevolt.org/news/al-sharpton-demonstrates-hes-clueless-about-global-warming

When the purveyors of global warming, er, climate change gloom and doom, when they change THEIR lifestyles with regard to THEIR personal energy consumption, then I just might begin to take them seriously.

A little.

http://i81.photobucket.com/albums/j228/4MyDogs/gifs%20and%20smilies/beach.gif

[RidgeRunner]

Milk isn't good for you, no wait it is OK to drink milk now for strong bones. No wait, it isn't good for you anymore.

:zip:

[Pipe_Dream]

"Boldly Going Where No Greens Have Gone Before
Why do Leonardo DiCaprio and Richard Branson lecture us about carbon consumption while plotting trips to space?"

http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702304325004579296781320668314

[Pipe_Dream]

Milk isn't good for you, no wait it is OK to drink milk now for strong bones. No wait, it isn't good for you anymore.

:zip:

"Polar Vortex" cause by global cooling, er, wait . . . global warming.

http://pjmedia.com/eddriscoll/2014/01/07/time-magazine-swings-both-ways/

[spareparts]

the EPA lost all credibility when they reclassified CO as a greenhouse gas.

[bradford]

"Polar Vortex" cause by global cooling, er, wait . . . global warming.

http://pjmedia.com/eddriscoll/2014/01/07/time-magazine-swings-both-ways/


coldfront=nor'easter=blizzard=POLAR VORTEX

Is anyone else getting damn tired of being constantly lied to by those who for some reason think they can put on their pants some way other than one leg at a time?

Problem is most of the sheep go for it.

[RWilson2526]

I kind of approach global warming like I do God and religion. Not convinced it exists but not a bad idea to toe the line just in case.

[Pipe_Dream]

Too hot? Global warming.
Too cold? Climate change.
Polar ice receding? Global warming.
Polar ice expanding? Climate change.
Heavy rain? Flood? Global warming/climate change.
Drought? Global warming/climate change.
Wildfire? Global warming/climate change.
Tornado? Global warming/climate change.
Hurricane? Global warming/climate change.

When you next encounter a true believer, ask them what weather phenomenon they can't attribute to global warming, er, climate change. Then sit back, sip your drink and enjoy the show.

[Pipe_Dream]

http://i81.photobucket.com/albums/j228/4MyDogs/Hell-Freezes-Over-copy_zps00afb131.jpg
http://i81.photobucket.com/albums/j228/4MyDogs/Sharknado-v-Polar-copy_zps4fde763b.jpg
http://i81.photobucket.com/albums/j228/4MyDogs/Explain-Warming-copy_zps99c7abff.jpg
http://i81.photobucket.com/albums/j228/4MyDogs/Devil-and-Warming-copy_zps64e3deef.jpg

[Pipe_Dream]

http://i81.photobucket.com/albums/j228/4MyDogs/Ice-Reality-copy_zps7341c127.jpg
http://i81.photobucket.com/albums/j228/4MyDogs/Inconvenient-Truth-copy_jpg_pagespeed_ic_eeOZjPyZ3i_zpsd452b32b.jpg
http://i81.photobucket.com/albums/j228/4MyDogs/Ice-Irony-copy_zpse6257cd7.jpg

[Destroyer]

LOL Love them Pipe.:you:

[Redneck]

It is supposed to feel like -48c/-55f tomorrow morning. Saskatchewan is in the -60c/-70f's. I guess hit the beer store and load up on fire wood for the weekend:beer:.

[spareparts]

how this for some interesting reading from the former founder of Greenpeace before the senate hearing on climate change last week

http://www.epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Files.View&FileStore_id=415b9cde-e664-4628-8fb5-ae3951197d03

and for those that don't want to read all 42 pages


"There is no scientific proof that human emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) are the
dominant cause of the minor warming of the Earth’s atmosphere over the past 100
years. If there were such a proof it would be written down for all to see. No actual
proof, as it is understood in science, exists."

[Redneck]

Parts of Saskatchewan are going to hit -100 to -110c tonight.:cen:

[bradford]

Parts of Saskatchewan are going to hit -100 to -110c tonight.:cen:
Unreal!!! :oh:

[Big-G]

I'm no climate warmer or global changer but the water level in my area (Chesapeake Bay Area) has risen noticeably in the last 30 some odd years.
Someone told me there are more large ships sailing the oceans which adds weight causing the water to rise. Doesn't matter. The water is still rising. Might as well get some political traction by claiming your own reasons. This uneducated redneck just sees the water rising and wonders.

[Big-G]

how this for some interesting reading from the former founder of Greenpeace before the senate hearing on climate change last week

http://www.epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Files.View&FileStore_id=415b9cde-e664-4628-8fb5-ae3951197d03

and for those that don't want to read all 42 pages


"There is no scientific proof that human emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) are the
dominant cause of the minor warming of the Earth’s atmosphere over the past 100
years. If there were such a proof it would be written down for all to see. No actual
proof, as it is understood in science, exists.". Thanks for the link. I have a friend who has his PHD in physics who is a global warming climate changer. I'll send him this link but will surely get a reply that confirms his opinion (along with Dianne Reams) that I am an uneducated redneck.

:clap:

[spareparts]

my parents have a place in NC that sits on a canal, linked to a bay, that is intersected by the Intracoastal water way, that's right around the corner from a major inlet. I have pictures of our sea wall from back in the 70's and pictures as recent as last fall, you can see the vegetation line across the sea wall, still in the same place it was 40 years ago. We were told back in the 70's if the earth warmed one degree, New York City would be under water, we can only hope so.

[cterrebonne]

the EPA lost all credibility when they reclassified CO as a greenhouse gas.

I know, it's silly really.

knowing what I know by studying statistics heavily in college, the data the the scientist are touting as evidence that man is altering the course of the climate does not convince me either way.

The data points fluctuate so much and to such extremes that it makes it very hard to accurately predict a trend.

[spareparts]

that should have said reclassified CO2. It had nothing to do with climate change, it was all about making sure hydrogen fuel cell vehicles would not be compliant and the current administration got the green light to push ethanol fuel and piss money away on failed solar companies.

[bradford]

that should have said reclassified CO2. It had nothing to do with climate change, it was all about making sure hydrogen fuel cell vehicles would not be compliant and the current administration got the green light to push ethanol fuel and piss money away on failed solar companies.


There's this car......that runs on water man........

http://youtu.be/RIqKS6YQYtQ

[spareparts]

you know I've been watching that 70's show lately:clap:

[LESTERUS]

"Boldly Going Where No Greens Have Gone Before
Why do Leonardo DiCaprio and Richard Branson lecture us about carbon consumption while plotting trips to space?"

http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702304325004579296781320668314

Why should we listen to Leonardo Di Caprio on global warming?

[bradford]

Why should we listen to Leonardo Di Caprio on global warming?


"Why should we listen to Leonardo Di Crapio?"

FIXED.

[Pipe_Dream]

Why should we listen to Leonardo Di Caprio on global warming?

Because he's an authority on creating large carbon footprints?
http://guardianlv.com/2014/06/leonardo-dicaprio-talks-ocean-conservation-but-rents-super-yacht-to-party/

:head:

[bradford]

What a douchebag.

[bradford]

Why should we listen to Leonardo Di Caprio on global warming?


Lesterus, good to see you, damn it's been since 2010 since you posted last!

Hope you weren't locked up!

Not to de-rail, but ya got any pics or stories about taking the V to Cuba or Bimini? Maybe in another thread.

[Larryrsf]

I like to believe that I am open-minded and am not a "denier" about global warming, er, climate change or about any other scientific or political issue. On the issue of global warming, er climate change, I do not believe that the science has made its case, and in particular I do not trust the UN to deliver the goods with regard to anything scientific. When I read this fellow's comments (link below) I found myself in complete agreement.

http://nypost.com/2013/12/05/global-warming-proof-is-evaporating/

But, but . . .

Al Sharpton!
http://www.truthrevolt.org/news/al-sharpton-demonstrates-hes-clueless-about-global-warming

When the purveyors of global warming, er, climate change gloom and doom, when they change THEIR lifestyles with regard to THEIR personal energy consumption, then I just might begin to take them seriously.

A little.

http://i81.photobucket.com/albums/j228/4MyDogs/gifs%20and%20smilies/beach.gif

All we need to know is that they NEVER predict what will happen NEXT year! Their doom predictions are always far into the future, when every climate prediction fades into thousands of factors that make it unpredictable.

And the past predictions have proven this. They were predicting massive ice melts, etc. 40 years ago. They predicted several FEET in ocean raising. Less than a fraction of an inch actually occurred. Temperatures predicted to rise by several degrees didn't rise at all!

So we would be FOOLS to act on the strength of shaky climate models, simply computer-generated projections. Other nations are not fooled by this crap, why should America lead?

Larry

[spareparts]

now we have too much ice because of global warming
http://dailycaller.com/2014/07/03/govt-scientists-antarctic-sea-ice-is-growing-because-of-global-warming/

[bradford]

now we have too much ice because of global warming
http://dailycaller.com/2014/07/03/govt-scientists-antarctic-sea-ice-is-growing-because-of-global-warming/


Well piss on my shoes and tell me it's raining......Damn!